Re: My last words

From: Androcles (dummy_at_dummy.net)
Date: 12/17/04 

Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:02:00 GMT

"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:41C207E7.2E84A70A@hate.spam.net...
> Androcles wrote:
>>
>> "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
>> news:41C1B186.BB605E45@hate.spam.net...
>> > Roy B wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Those who can do.
>> >>
>> >> Those who can't teach.
>> >>
>> >> Einstein was a patent clerk when he came up with relativity.
>> >
>> > False analogy. Feynman was a teacher when he got his 1965 Noble
>> > Prize
>> > in Physics, ditto Frank Wilczek and his 2004 Nobel Prize in
>> > Physics,
>> > ditto Steven Chu and his 1997 Nobel Prize in Physics...
>> >
>> >> Do not think a Ph. D. means you are smarter than everyone. Or
>> >> better
>> >> than
>> >> everyone.
>> >>
>> >> Open your mind.
>> >
>> [snip crap]
>>
>> > A PhD in the hard sciences requires an IQ in excess of 120; in
>> > physics
>> > about 130. That is the top 2% of the population. He git - can YOU
>> > solve ordinary differential equations?
>>
>> I doubt he thinks winter is in orbit, fucking moron.
>> I'd teach you astronomy, but you are ineducable.
>> As for Ph.D.'s, some can't count to 14...
>> http://www.androc1es.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/KoksDoppler.htm
>> and others can only snip or ignore what they have no answer for.
>> [snip Schwartz crap]
>> Androcles.
>
> 1) Does it burn, stooopid Androcles, does it burn?

Not at all, imbecile Shwartz. Piss on the third rail or into the wind
all you want to, my hide is impervious to any flame a wanker like
you could muster. I'm enjoying myself. Pity you are too incompetent
to debate physics, or I'd have even more fun with you.
Here, pick the bones out of this.
1) "light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c
which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body"
2) "the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of
an infinitely great velocity."
3) "But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when
measured in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v, so that
x'/(c-v) = t."
4) "It follows, further, that the velocity of light c cannot be altered
by composition with a velocity less than that of light. For this case we
obtain V = (c+w)/(1+w/c) = c."

Which one did you wish to use, stooopid fucking imbecile Schwartz?
a) w = c
b) w = c+v
c) w = infinity
d) w = (c+v)/(1+v/c)
That IS your idea of consistent, right?
Oh, I almost forgot. The quotations are from YOUR citation, whole-arse.
  http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
ROFLMAO!

[remaining crap snipped unread]
Androcles.

> Uncle Al
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Quantcast