Re: Homosexual Marriage? It's an Obscene Joke
From: Bob Schmall (rschmall_at_wi.rr.com)
Date: 12/18/04
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: Questions on electron transport in metals"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities"
- Maybe in reply to: Anonymous: "Re: Homosexual Marriage? It's an Obscene Joke"
- Next in thread: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Homosexual Marriage? It's an Obscene Joke"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:21:40 -0600
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
news:1103392049.176093.203530@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Bob, good point.
> You're right, the gay people can fill in the license anyway
> they want, and the legal BS vanishes. The JP need not judge
> the authentication of the information, it would be up to a
> prosecutor, motivated by a criminal activity, from a
> complaintant to level fraud charges, if that document is
> harmful to said party.
> As a prosecutor, I'd hate to ask for a search warrant
> to find out if someone who claims to be a woman isn't,
> I think you'd need some very serious charge related to
> a sexual offense to do that.
>
> Brilliant Bob, really, you took everybody off the hook,
> with that loop-hole. Now there's no need to *** with
> homo marriage, one or the other signers to the marriage
> liscense declares they of the opposite sex to the other,
> simple enough.
> I hope the queers don't contest that, because parents
> are understandably ansy about the issue.
> Regards and Thanks
> Ken S. Tucker
You're a prosecutor? Wow, you sure don't spell very well.
- Next message: John Larkin: "Re: Questions on electron transport in metals"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities"
- Maybe in reply to: Anonymous: "Re: Homosexual Marriage? It's an Obscene Joke"
- Next in thread: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Homosexual Marriage? It's an Obscene Joke"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]