Re: Top Secret Earth Station Message-Five Star-*****
From: nightbat (nightbat_at_home.ffni.com)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "FLASH MEMORY BOOSTS, SIZE SHRINKS"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: Questions on electron transport in metals"
- Next in thread: eleaticus: "Space? or the lilght? was: Top Secret Earth Station Message-Five Star-*****"
- Reply: eleaticus: "Space? or the lilght? was: Top Secret Earth Station Message-Five Star-*****"
- Reply: Tom Potter: "Re: Top Secret Earth Station Message-Five Star-*****"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:43:38 -0500
nightbat wrote
Bill Sheppard wrote:
>
> Yo Night
> Amongst your distinguished assemblage of science officers
> there, someone oughta be able to clear up a few questions about the
> speed of light. Fer instance, why is c fixed invariantly at the value
> that it is? Why isn't it higher? Or lower? Or infinite? Earthling
> science attributes the fixed value of c to the 'permittivity and
> permeability' of space.
> Well, this creates a quandary because Earthling science
> is predicated on the axiom that space is functionally a void, or
> 'Nothing'. So how can 'Nothing' have properties? How can a 'void'
> exhibit distinct, invariant properties such as
> permittivity/permeability, or 'curvature' as in the case of gravity?
> Surely your distinguished panel has considered that
> the high value of c is indicative of a medium of enormous hydrostatic
> pressure and sub-Planck energy density.. and that this medium is a
> perfect fluid (or 'hyperfluid') underlying and fixing the Newtonian laws
> of inertia and momentum.
> And maybe(?) the enormous hydostatic pressure of the
> "void" actually exceeds the degeneracy pressure of the atomic nucleus..
> explaining gravity's ability to crush even massive stars down to
> singuarities. And herein would lie the unification of gravity and the
> strong nuclear force.
> Just like that fish living in the depths of the
> Marianas Trench who's oblivious to the water pressure, we are likewise
> Pressure Dwellers oblivious to the hydrostatic pressure of space itself.
> What sayest your esteemed off-world science panel?
> Old labrat
> oc
nightbat
Hello oc, your question concerning the space vacuum and its
general present no physical evidence ether premise is duly acknowledged
and relative science newsgroups redirected for group member and multi
science Officer candidate data input. As you know oc presently first
cause space vacuum is one of the deepest theoretical physics and
astronomy subjects handled only by the most ablest and dedicated of
researcher chosen field of interest inquiry. Its resolution is not
presently necessary for Newtonian or Relativity based man made
coordinate system handling but remains in question and general non
derived to 1st cause base understanding. I have relayed my input in this
but understand you request further peer guided assistance in the further
possible logical understanding or mathematical applied derivation.
I will also request that only the most profound serious of these science
newsgroup science members respectfully respond due to the highly complex
nature of your question. I will not exclude Darla research crew input if
they so desire to relay top level extraterrestrial guarded knowledge for
Earth frame hopeful resolution. I caution they themselves may not be
privileged in this highly difficult physics 1st cause expertise area of
question.
the nightbat
- Next message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "FLASH MEMORY BOOSTS, SIZE SHRINKS"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: Questions on electron transport in metals"
- Next in thread: eleaticus: "Space? or the lilght? was: Top Secret Earth Station Message-Five Star-*****"
- Reply: eleaticus: "Space? or the lilght? was: Top Secret Earth Station Message-Five Star-*****"
- Reply: Tom Potter: "Re: Top Secret Earth Station Message-Five Star-*****"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
