Re: Top Secret Earth Station Message-Five Star-*****

From: Tom Potter (tdp_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 12/21/04 

Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:01:08 +0800

"nightbat" <nightbat@home.ffni.com> wrote in message
news:41C72B6A.A033CB38@home.ffni.com...
> nightbat wrote
>
> Bill Sheppard wrote:
> >
> > Yo Night
> > Amongst your distinguished assemblage of science officers
> > there, someone oughta be able to clear up a few questions about the
> > speed of light. Fer instance, why is c fixed invariantly at the value
> > that it is? Why isn't it higher? Or lower? Or infinite? Earthling
> > science attributes the fixed value of c to the 'permittivity and
> > permeability' of space.
> > Well, this creates a quandary because Earthling science
> > is predicated on the axiom that space is functionally a void, or
> > 'Nothing'. So how can 'Nothing' have properties? How can a 'void'
> > exhibit distinct, invariant properties such as
> > permittivity/permeability, or 'curvature' as in the case of gravity?
> > Surely your distinguished panel has considered that
> > the high value of c is indicative of a medium of enormous hydrostatic
> > pressure and sub-Planck energy density.. and that this medium is a
> > perfect fluid (or 'hyperfluid') underlying and fixing the Newtonian laws
> > of inertia and momentum.
> > And maybe(?) the enormous hydostatic pressure of the
> > "void" actually exceeds the degeneracy pressure of the atomic nucleus..
> > explaining gravity's ability to crush even massive stars down to
> > singuarities. And herein would lie the unification of gravity and the
> > strong nuclear force.
> > Just like that fish living in the depths of the
> > Marianas Trench who's oblivious to the water pressure, we are likewise
> > Pressure Dwellers oblivious to the hydrostatic pressure of space itself.
> > What sayest your esteemed off-world science panel?
> > Old labrat
> > oc
>
> nightbat
>
> Hello oc, your question concerning the space vacuum and its
> general present no physical evidence ether premise is duly acknowledged
> and relative science newsgroups redirected for group member and multi
> science Officer candidate data input. As you know oc presently first
> cause space vacuum is one of the deepest theoretical physics and
> astronomy subjects handled only by the most ablest and dedicated of
> researcher chosen field of interest inquiry. Its resolution is not
> presently necessary for Newtonian or Relativity based man made
> coordinate system handling but remains in question and general non
> derived to 1st cause base understanding. I have relayed my input in this
> but understand you request further peer guided assistance in the further
> possible logical understanding or mathematical applied derivation.
>
> I will also request that only the most profound serious of these science
> newsgroup science members respectfully respond due to the highly complex
> nature of your question. I will not exclude Darla research crew input if
> they so desire to relay top level extraterrestrial guarded knowledge for
> Earth frame hopeful resolution. I caution they themselves may not be
> privileged in this highly difficult physics 1st cause expertise area of
> question.

First off,
time intervals, not "rigid rods"
are the true measure of space.

"Rigid rods" are nasty, temperature sensitive, pressure sensitive,
bending sensitive, vibration sensitive, acceleration sensitive, etc. beasts.

Secondly, time intervals use a time period reference (Clock)
to quantize intervals between assumed causes at one point,
and assumed effects at another point.
High auto-correlations verify the relationships between the two points.

Thirdly, the same time period source (Clock)
that is used to quantize the time interval (The space)
between two points, is used to measure the time period
between the cause and the effect.

As can be seen, the so-called time period between
a cause and an effect, is actually a TIME INTERVAL
and particularly, THE time interval equated to the
space between the cause and the effect.

So what is being done here,
is that the time interval between a cause and an effect,
is being divided by a time period
which in fact is the same time interval,
so you will always come out with a constant.

And what constant will you come out with?
The constant that is used to equate
time intervals to some rigid rod. "C"

This whole idea of "C" worship
blows the minds of us old space travelers.

We know that time is an auto-correlation
of events associated with one body,
and the spaces are cross-correlations
associated with two bodies,
and that area fields are three body correlations, etc.

Hopefully, the primitive people on Earth,
will come to comprehend this,
as they evolve.

In the meantime,
I don't want any of those "C" worshippers
on my space ship.

I get "C" sick when they rave on and on
about all the mysteries of the "C" God. 

--
Tom Potter     http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp