Re: Why Hitler is a Hero
From: Tom Potter (tdp_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 12/23/04
- Next message: Tom Potter: "Re: nuclei role in thermodynamics/energy transport?"
- Previous message: jahn: "Re: An Even Better OWLS Experiment."
- In reply to: Mark Fergerson: "Re: Why Hitler is a Hero"
- Next in thread: Mark Fergerson: "Re: Why Hitler is a Hero"
- Reply: Mark Fergerson: "Re: Why Hitler is a Hero"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:21:06 +0800
"Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> wrote in message
news:NIfyd.73743$DC.22384@fed1read03...
> Tom Potter wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> His usual screed.
>
> > As can be seen,
> > "Mark Fergerson" continues to propagandize for
> > the people who are instigating the religious wars of the
> 2000's.
>
> You are so very pompously full of ***. You completely
> fail to see your own willing complicity in these very same
> affairs.
>
> As can be seen, "Tom Potter" continues his attempts to
> minimalize those who dare contradict him by implying they
> are hiding behind assumed names.
>
> > I wonder how he and the war-for-profit gang
> > would react, if they were systematically brutalized,
> humiliated,
> > their homes, schools, businesses and infrastructure were
> destroyed,
> > and they couldn't go to school, go to a hospital, visit
> their friends,
> > take a ***, without having to go through a check point,
> > operated by egocentric paranoiacs?
>
> I _am_ being so victimized by your Liberal friends and
> their agendas. It continues to get worse.
>
> > The fact of the matter is,
> > Sharon is the motive force behind the present disorder.
>
> No. This is an ongoing situation that reaches thousands
> of years into history. You absolutely refuse to see this.
> You are indeed ineducable.
>
> > The Middle East situation was near a settlement before
> > Sharon instigated the assassination of Rabin, and it was near
> > settlement again, before Sharon intruded back onto the scene
> > by barging into a Muslim place of worship, escorted by scores
> > of thugs armed with assault weapons. And still the Middle
> East
> > was safer than Washington, D.C. before Sharon took power,
> > and escalated the brutality and humiliation of the
> Palestinians.
>
> Bull***. Arafat refused any and all offers. You refuse
> to acknowledge this, and his reasons for refusal. Hence your
> willing participation in the ongoing "religion wars".
>
> > Sharon is a madman with a history of violence.
> > He instigated the Pearl Harbor attack on Lebanon,
> > and the slaughter of thousands of Palestinians,
> > and had the American ship Liberty attacked,
> > and the helpless sailors in the water strafed.
>
> Handwaved bull***.
>
> > Many folks think that he had the Marine barracks in
> Lebanon bombed,
> > and blamed it on the Arabs, in order to keep America from
> protecting
> > the Palestinians he was trying to slaughter.
>
> _You_ accept this without critical examination because it
> reinforces your hateful attitudes.
>
> > Sharon's plan was and is to agitate the Arabs into reacting,
> > and then using his political clout in America to get American
> > Blacks, Rednecks and Latino's to sacrifice their lives,
> dollars
> > and freedom to achieve his goal.
>
> Pure Sorosisms.
>
> > Power, money, land, oil, cheap, non-Jewish labor.
>
> Fear-mongering.
>
> > It is interesting to see that Sharon and his gang
> > are instigating religious warfare,
> > just as the war-for-profit instigators instigated the
> class warfare
> > that lead to the massacre of Russian Royalty,
> > the rise of Hitler, WWII, the Cold War,
> > with all the little wars (Korea, Vietnam, etc.) that
> followed.
>
> Same old antiSemite line you've always followed.
>
> Both you and the pro-Semites are _pawns_. Recognize this
> and many things become clearer. What you fail to do is see
> just how far back the chessplayers go historically, or their
> real loyalites.
>
> > The same gang that profited from the class war in Russia,
> > migrated to Israel after they raped Russia, and
> > they have joined with Sharon in instigating a
> > religious war, that they hope to profit from,
> > as they did with their class wars.
>
> Same old Sorosisms.
I suggest that "Mark Fergerson" sympathies (Prejudices?)
can be seen by reading excerpts from some of his posts.
=================
Do the Muslims really think they can nuke Israel and India
and not devastate the entire Middle East? Do they really
think the U.S. and her allies won't stomp the hell out of
them even if they manage a perfect pre-emptive strike? Will
the rest of the world stand by and let it happen, knowing
full well they'll have to come in afterward and clean up the mess.
==============
Because we're rich, and they're not. Because
we're free, and they're not. Because primitive is
better than civilized (according to Liberals).
Because we (the West) had a Renaissance, and they
didn't. Because they think they're the only ones
qualified to define "evil" by their
misinterpretation of Islam.
==========================
There is no point in "getting back"; revenge is a
pathetic, primitive, fundamentalist idea. As far as I'm
concerned, eliminating Islam (not Muslims) is simple
self-defense. Islam is flat-out dangerous to everyone
_including_ its adherents.
==========================
Note what happened to territory the
Palestinians Arabs _used_ to live in; it
was ceded to Egypt and Jordan. So who
should "return" which land to the
Palestinians?
=======================
> Exactly what has Isreal done?
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Tried to selectively kill the most bloodthirsty of the
"Palestinian" leaders, tried to build walls to keep the
bombers out, and so on, none of which works because the two
sides have two entirely different objectives.
The Israelis want the "Palestinians" to stop trying to
kill all of them and build something resembling a society,
but the "Palestinians" are solely interested in
exterminating the Israelis.
======================
Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>unfortunately its not likely to happen. Little things like the clearly
>>observable FACT that decades of repressive behaviour towards the
>>palestinians has NOT resolved the problem, but made it WORSE, seem to have
>>escaped the notice of successive israeli governments. so much for "an eye
>>for an eye" being of any practical use.
Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Um, Israel is backed up against the Mediterranean. What
impenetrable barrier are the "Palestinians" backed up against?
=============
And as can be seen,
Mark Fergerson" favors the annihilation of Muslims,
and he actively propagandizes that position.
Of course, those killed and maimed
in the process will be Muslims,
and American Blacks, Rednecks and Latinos,
NOT the people who instigate conflict and war
for power and riches.
-- Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
- Next message: Tom Potter: "Re: nuclei role in thermodynamics/energy transport?"
- Previous message: jahn: "Re: An Even Better OWLS Experiment."
- In reply to: Mark Fergerson: "Re: Why Hitler is a Hero"
- Next in thread: Mark Fergerson: "Re: Why Hitler is a Hero"
- Reply: Mark Fergerson: "Re: Why Hitler is a Hero"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]