Dark Matter, Gravity, and the Creation of the Universe – A New Look.
From: John L Aldridge (info_at_targetcentre.com)
Date: 01/01/05
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: large N dot products: OK, OK, How about this one?"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc."
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: Dark Matter, Gravity, and the Creation of the Universe – A New Look."
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Dark Matter, Gravity, and the Creation of the Universe – A New Look."
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Dark Matter, Gravity, and the Creation of the Universe - A New Look."
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Dark Matter, Gravity, and the Creation of the Universe Q?= A New Look."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 1 Jan 2005 04:27:01 -0800
First wriiten in November 2002
The problem with explaining this theory is knowing where to begin,
because as you will find, the theory incorporates some of the great
mysteries of the Universe, in what I believe can be defined in one
working model.
Let us start at a fraction of a second after the creation of the
Universe – the actual creation and the effect that it has on this
theory I will deal with later. After the first wave of the creation,
we have all the energy of the universe concentrated in a space smaller
than our Sun, a quantity of energy that goes towards infinity. There
is nothing that has existed after this event that can even come close
to comparison; even the most horrendous black hole is but a grain of
sand in a seemingly endless ocean in comparison.
The matter that is expelled into the void during our "fraction of a
second" consists of particles that I have defined simply as
base-particles. These particles are the original building bricks of
all forms of matter that is yet to come.
Before going further, I wish to postulate a modification to "The
Theory of Finite Probability". When we begin to deal with numbers of
enormous size (N.E.S.) - the creation of the Universe is a good
example - the possibility to calculate the probability of an action
goes towards infinity, while that action, within time, will certainly
verify itself. An example: If Superman went back in time to witness
the creation of the Universe, what probability could he calculate on
the first particles transforming into life forms or computers?
Obviously, he could not make the calculation, but we and computers do
exist; and therefore with N.E.S.'s the improbable, however remote,
becomes probable; the improbability existing only due to its
incalculability.
Before going onto defining my models of base-particles, Dark Matter,
and Gravity, I must first take a step back to the death of one
Universe and the creation of the next, with each Universe existing in
the same void.
I have read that it is believed improbably that our Universe was
created from the last giant black hole of the old universe collapsing
into itself, as this would have converted all the remaining matter
into energy, which would mean that gravity would eventually go to
zero, and that the last sign of the old universe would have been an
enormous flash of radiation that would have dissipated into the void.
This would mean that all the parallel universes are destined to die,
leaving multi-parallel voids.
This does seem somewhat final to me, and I would therefore like to
propose another possibility. Let us remain with our collapsing giant
black hole; the only object left in the old universe. As the rate of
collapse accelerates due to the increasing gravitational field, the
temperature at the core increases, and sub-nuclei are destroyed and
converted one after the other into heat energy. We will reach a point
were the black hole will only consist of electromagnetic radiation
(the skin) and base-particles (the core). The base-particles, for this
model, can be defined as the smallest possible unit of matter that is
constructed by the smallest possible unit of energy, and therefore by
definition cannot be divided into a smaller sub-unit or converted into
electromagnetic radiation due to decay; and neither can
electromagnetic radiation be formed into matter due to its inability
to unit (two rays will always remain two, they will never be able to
unit into one). The total number of base-particles massed together
will give a maximum value for the gravitational force of the Universe,
which we can consider to have a value of one. All other forms of
matter will have a gravitational force that is proportional to its
quantity of base-particles that it contains, and will always have a
coefficient less than one. However, the maximum gravitational force
divided by the total number of base-particles within the universe will
also give us the smallest possible value of a gravitational unit.
Back to our collapsing giant black hole. Before all the matter decays
to either electromagnetic energy or base-particles, something very
strange happens at the core; the temperature (T1 – the first threshold
temperature) arrives to such a level that forces the base-particles at
the surface of the "core", which are also in contact with the
electromagnetic "skin" to link to an n quantity of electromagnetic
energy (photon), At this point, the couple transform into "pure
energy", otherwise known as Dark Matter; and the quantity transformed
is proportional to the temperature that must be equal or greater than
T1. Each base-particle/photon couple creates its own individual space
within the universe, this space has no dimensions and the Couple no
mass, and therefore no time (or speed) that links it to events in the
universe, and therefore completely undetectable from the universe in
which it exists.
The couple is similar to a photon, the difference being that the
transformation has been from matter+photon to a packet of energy of
zero mass that can be transformed back to matter, and that can also
co-exist with matter as we know it (not to be confused with
anti-matter).
The base-particle/photon Couple also has a gravitational attraction
greater than a single base-particle, but in opposition to that of the
single base particle, thus creating an anti-gravitational field that
emits from the Dark Matter.
At first the quantity of Dark Matter with respect to Matter is very
small, but it still has the effect of increasing further the speed of
collapse of the black hole, which in turn increases the core
temperature. Now the difficult part; what comes next is pure
supposition, but if it is true makes everything work. There will be a
stage when the temperature will increase to a value that is greater
than T1 (T2) when all the remaining base-particles and photons will
convert to Dark Matter. The old universe is dead, and there remains
just a void.
Almost instantly after the death, the rebirth begins. All the
base-particles enter the new Universe. Some speed out into the void,
other base-particles will begin to form the first in a long chain of
sub-particles, which will cause the cooling process. But due to the
high temperature, the majority of the sub-particles will be converted
back to Dark Matter. Some of this Dark Matter will have sufficient
energy to revert back to base-particles, while the remainder will
remain in the form of Dark Matter.
The birth of our Universe will be like a flashing light, with each
flash lasting a finite moment of time, but with the mass of each flash
being smaller than the last as more sub-particles are released into
the Universe; wave after wave like a pumping heart. The overall effect
is that the Dark Matter would help in thinning out the Universe and
thus assisting the cooling process, it would also have predominance
over matter as we know it.
It might be asked "well if Dark Matter is in this universe, what
happened to it in the old? Good question, and one that is easily
answered. As stated above, if Dark Matter is given sufficient energy
it will transform back to base-particles. This could happen in our
Universe if a galactic catastrophe were to happen in the mists of an
area of space containing a high proportion of Dark Matter. The
catastrophe could be of such proportions that sufficient Dark Matter
would be transformed into Matter that the gravitational balance would
be reversed, which in turn would slowly bring the expansion of the
Universe to a halt, and then causing it to contract – remember my
modification to the Theory of Finite Probability.
I hope that I will be forgiven for any grave errors, but then I am
only a scientist by hobby and not by profession.
If you have and questions, or any comments (constructive or
otherwise), I would be very pleased to receive them.
John L. Aldridge
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: large N dot products: OK, OK, How about this one?"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc."
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: Dark Matter, Gravity, and the Creation of the Universe – A New Look."
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Dark Matter, Gravity, and the Creation of the Universe – A New Look."
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Dark Matter, Gravity, and the Creation of the Universe - A New Look."
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Dark Matter, Gravity, and the Creation of the Universe Q?= A New Look."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|