Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?
From: Jesse Mazer (vze2ztqw_at_mail.verizon.net)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Previous message: JLeeCforRP: "The TOTAL disproof of Relativity and current QM"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- Next in thread: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- Reply: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:39:02 GMT
Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
>In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501261049540.29380-100000@erodium.hep.wisc.edu>,
>Creighton Hogg <wchogg@hep.wisc.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>Of course, when you draw the worldlines for the two twins, it then becomes
>>obvious that their situations are not equivalent and hence there is no
>>paradox.
>>
>>
>
>You drew the world lines with the Earth at the origin, didn't you? What
>happens when you draw the world lines with the spaceship at the origin?
>
>
>
>
>
Then the spaceship stays at the origin until it accelerates, at which
point its world line slants away from the origin.
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Previous message: JLeeCforRP: "The TOTAL disproof of Relativity and current QM"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- Next in thread: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- Reply: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]