Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
From: kenseto (kenseto_at_erinet.com)
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: OsherD: "Re: Quantum Hydrogen Atom and E = wLF"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Famous Scientists Who Died In The Holocaust"
- In reply to: Bernardz: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:35:40 GMT
"Bernardz" <Bernard_zzz@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c6205311bdea6c989bf7@news...
> In article <SL3Jd.20364$QC5.18924@fe2.columbus.rr.com>,
> kenseto@erinet.com says...
> >
> > "Bernardz" <Bernard_zzz@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.1c5ea60aad35ad3a989beb@news...
> > > In article <_NOId.6675$VZ2.5986@fe1.columbus.rr.com>,
kenseto@erinet.com
> > > says...
> > > > IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
> > > > It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
> > > > environments....including gravity.
> > > >
> > > > The following is a description of IRT:
> > > > The postulates:
> > > > 1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light path
> > > > length of a measuring rod are the same for all observers in
> > > > all inertial reference frames.
> > > > 2) The speed of light in free space based on a clock second
> > > > and the light path length of a measuring rod has the same
> > > > mathematical ratio c in all directions and all inertial frames.
> > > > 3) The laws of physics based on a defined absolute second
> > > > and the physical length of a rod is different in different frames
> > > > of reference.
> > > > 4) The one-way speed of light in free space based on a defined
absolute
> > > > second and the physical length of a measuring rod has a different
> > > > mathematical ratio for light speed in different inertial frames.
The
> > > > speed of light based on a defined absolute second and the physical
> > > > length of a measuring rod is maximum in the rest frame of the
aether.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The concept of absolute time does not exist in SR
> >
> > You are wrong. SR implies that absolute time exists. The purpose of the
SR
> > math is to predict the clock time value in the observed frame for an
> > interval of absolute time in the observer's frame. The GPS uses absolute
> > time to synchronize the satellite clocks with the ground clocks. They
> > redefined the satellite clock second to have 4.15 more ticks of the Cs
atom.
> > This redfined satellite second has the same absolute time content as the
> > ground clock second which uses the standard definition and which has
4.15
> > fewer ticks than the satellite clock second.
>
> Well before you can talk of something you must know the language that
> people use.
>
> To me and many in this forum I am sure, *absolute* time does not mean
> this!
It is irrelevant what you think. What I described is absolute time
(universal time).
>
>
> >
> > by adding it and
> > > creating IRT. IST becomes either a different set to SR or a subset to
> > > SR.
> >
> > ROTFLOL.....SR is an incomplete ether theory. It is a subset of IRT and
IRT
> > is a complete theory of motion. It equations are valid in all
> > environments....including gravity.
>
> By definition.
>
> With a system, if you introduce something to it but otherwise leave it
> the same what you have is a subset
ROTFLOL... you don't know what a subset mean.
>
> While if in that system you replace something in it, what you have is a
> new set.
IRT have 4 postuilates 2 of the postulates is SR and the other two expands
SR to include gravity. So SR is a subset of IRT. You donm't actually say
that GR is a subset of SR do you??
>
> While in that system, you take something out what it becomes is a super
> set.
Like I said you don't know what a subset mean.
Ken Seto
- Next message: OsherD: "Re: Quantum Hydrogen Atom and E = wLF"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Famous Scientists Who Died In The Holocaust"
- In reply to: Bernardz: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
