Re: Wind energy extraction
jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com
Date: 01/28/05
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Jan/28/2005"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Relativistic CMB"
- In reply to: Mr Clarke: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Reply: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:32:49 +0000 (UTC)
In sci.physics Mr Clarke <ashley@unbogusa-clarke.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Another design consideration could be based on a satalite dish
> whereby the wind is caught on a large surface area and reflected
> back (the other way) towards a smaller actuator!
> Well, it might look modern and highly technical to sponsors?
> It was simple design considerations like this which revolutionised
> water and steam turbines over the past couple of centuries. These
> old ideas are food for thought to apply to modern materials.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ashley Clarke
> -------------------------------------------------------
This is even worse than habshi's funnel.
Wind does not "reflect" like EM radiation.
-- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply.
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: Operation Troll Shoulder Jan/28/2005"
- Previous message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Relativistic CMB"
- In reply to: Mr Clarke: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Next in thread: tj Frazir: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Reply: tj Frazir: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Reply: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
