Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle
From: FrediFizzx (fredifizzx_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/02/05
- Next message: Jim Black: "Re: Parallel Universes & Secret Physics, why not?"
- Previous message: Jim Black: "Re: Parallel Universes & Secret Physics, why not?"
- In reply to: Emwizsoon: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Next in thread: Emwizsoon: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Emwizsoon: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:34:08 -0800
"Emwizsoon" <emwizsoon@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1104700339.372884.321330@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
|
| Franz Heymann wrote:
|
| I'm Major in Psychology and physics is just one subject in
| the whole course. I can't wait for 7 years to question
| before thinking of the interpretation. I can use deductions
| and all in the analysis.
|
| >
| > Not really. It is in the form of myriads of individual photons all
| > occupying closely similar wave functions.
| > If you had been talking about a coherent wave, as in a radio wave or
| a
| > laser wave, I would have said that those photons are all belong to
| the
| > same wave function.
|
| So when the light is travelling, the photons are not in form
| of particles but waves... as if the individual photons just
| became part of the unified wave. Is this why it can tell
| whether to form interference pattern when 2 slits are open
| versus one.
|
| I can accomodate the more unusual quantum interpretation
| of course, I'm use to strange stuff dealing with the
| mentally insane in my psychology field.
|
|
| > I can offer you an absolute guarantee that you cannot rewrite QM in
| > terms of Newtonian mechanics, except if you are willing to accept the
| > existence of the quantum potential introduced by Bohm.
|
| Waves is newtonian mechanics right, the web site is saying
| that waves interpretation can explain all the quantum data.
| I'm interested in the details of course and still looking
| into it.
The waves in quantum mechanics are not like newtonian waves. They are
probability waves. You need to take Franz's advice and read some good
textbooks about it if you are really that interested. Probably the easiest
textbook to understand with the full QM math is "Introduction to Quantum
Mechanics" by Griffiths. Even if you don't fully understand the math, read
it.
FrediFizzx
- Next message: Jim Black: "Re: Parallel Universes & Secret Physics, why not?"
- Previous message: Jim Black: "Re: Parallel Universes & Secret Physics, why not?"
- In reply to: Emwizsoon: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Next in thread: Emwizsoon: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Emwizsoon: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|