Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle
From: Emwizsoon (emwizsoon_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/02/05
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Six lane underground rail lines"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Six lane underground rail lines"
- In reply to: FrediFizzx: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Next in thread: Creighton Hogg: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Creighton Hogg: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 2 Jan 2005 13:40:30 -0800
FrediFizzx wrote:
> The waves in quantum mechanics are not like newtonian waves. They
are
> probability waves. You need to take Franz's advice and read some
good
> textbooks about it if you are really that interested. Probably the
easiest
> textbook to understand with the full QM math is "Introduction to
Quantum
> Mechanics" by Griffiths. Even if you don't fully understand the
math, read
> it.
>
> FrediFizzx
I know. All I'm saying is that we use probability waves because
we don't know how electrons behave around the nucleus. I mean,
when JJ Thomson discovered electrons were around the nucleus.
Scientists couldn't imagine how they move and bond with other
atoms, so they used the quantum probability cloud function model.
But if particles are really some kind of standing wave, then the
entire electron clouds are just standing waves of somekind.
Disprove this by precise scientific arguments.
http://www.blazelabs.com/f-p-swave.asp
Emwi
Major in Psychology (I have sufficient logic and intellect to
understand anything so don't let me wait for 7 years to
analyze them)
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Six lane underground rail lines"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Six lane underground rail lines"
- In reply to: FrediFizzx: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Next in thread: Creighton Hogg: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Creighton Hogg: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Sam Wormley: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]