Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle
From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 01/02/05
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Analogy Electromagnetism vs.Gravitation"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: 40M for Bush Inauguration and 15M for Tsunami Disaster WAS Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalitio"
- In reply to: Emwizsoon: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:50:28 GMT
Emwizsoon wrote:
>
> I know. All I'm saying is that we use probability waves because
> we don't know how electrons behave around the nucleus. I mean,
> when JJ Thomson discovered electrons were around the nucleus.
> Scientists couldn't imagine how they move and bond with other
> atoms, so they used the quantum probability cloud function model.
> But if particles are really some kind of standing wave, then the
> entire electron clouds are just standing waves of somekind.
http://voh.chem.ucla.edu/vohtar/fall00/20A-2/images/p-orbitals.gif
http://voh.chem.ucla.edu/vohtar/fall00/20A-2/images/s-orbitals.gif
http://voh.chem.ucla.edu/vohtar/fall00/20A-2/images/d-orbitals.gif
Quantum Mechanics
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/QuantumMechanics.html
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Analogy Electromagnetism vs.Gravitation"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: 40M for Bush Inauguration and 15M for Tsunami Disaster WAS Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalitio"
- In reply to: Emwizsoon: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|