Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused
From: Joseph Lazio (jlazio_at_adams.patriot.net)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Previous message: Milan: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Rob Dekker: "Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused"
- Next in thread: Rob Dekker: "Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused"
- Reply: Rob Dekker: "Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Jan 2005 08:07:28 -0500
>>>>> "RD" == Rob Dekker <rob@verific.com> writes:
RD> Mmm. BB theory clearly states that the Universe started out
RD> microscopically small. So all matter / energy in the Universe was
RD> once (in) one 'place' and 'time'.
No, it doesn't. This is a problem with common descriptions of the BB
model. The *observable* Universe became quite small in the past,
because the observable Universe is defined by the (speed of light) x
(age of the Universe).
The Universe as a whole could be (and probably is) much larger than
the observable Universe.
[...]
RD> I do not understand the horizon problem that was presented though.
RD> Seems to me there is some strange assumption there that something
RD> must be outside of the horizon, but I don't get why that
RD> assumption had to be made.
See above.
-- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: jlazio@patriot.net No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: Roberts versus Lazio on "Overaveraging""
- Previous message: Milan: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Rob Dekker: "Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused"
- Next in thread: Rob Dekker: "Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused"
- Reply: Rob Dekker: "Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|