Re: scale-free complexity may be wrong: CUNY

From: glbrad01 (glbrad01_at_insightbb.com)
Date: 01/30/05 

Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 15:09:39 GMT

<sawlake-gg@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1106970462.055484.21140@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> CUNY researchers have contradicted common assumptions about fractal
> patterns in complex networks, showing large webs are in fact
> self-similar:
> http://glikglik.blogspot.com/2005/01/self-similarity-shocker.html
>

  If infinite and infinitesimal themselves are fundamentally self-similar,
what did you suppose for top-down and bottom-up, or outside-in and
inside-out, whatever, finite scales of anything that has some sort of
mirroring or stereotypical constancy to it? But these are all just four
dimensions of the same thing: infinity.

Brad

Relevant Pages

  • Re: paths through binary trees in ZF
    ... infinite paths ... depth nodes under 1 root)  has ... only countably many infinite branches through it,  thereby showing  ZF ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: .99999999999999 = 1 and formally real fields
    ... This is not what I was showing. ... infinite number of dimensions used in the analysis. ... a finite way within about 16 significant figures in the series. ... I have already shown that Partial Sums is inaccurate like for example with ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: paths through binary trees in ZF
    ... only countably many infinite branches through it,  thereby showing  ZF ... inconsistent since it also ... In fact, in any complete infinite binary tree, each node "distinguishes" ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Collatz conjecture
    ... Conjecture must have an infinite number of lines". ... course incorrect, and it's a good example of its kind. ... is a prime' is determined in showing that there exists an m>10^100 ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: .99999999999999 = 1 and formally real fields
    ... > This is not what I was showing. ... > infinite number of dimensions used in the analysis. ... > series showing that it could converge but it would be inaccurate or have some ... > I have already shown that Partial Sums is inaccurate like for example with ...
    (sci.math)