Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: OsherD: "Re: Solving For Potential From E = wLF"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?"
- In reply to: Keith P Walsh: "Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:11:52 -0800
Keith P Walsh wrote:
>
> Hi fans,
>
> Media coverage for the 100th anniversary of Einstein's "annus
> mirabilis" has been attracting my attention.
Science quivers at the mere possibility of your notice.
> The BBC's "Horizon" TV program did a good job of establishing that the
> equation E=mc^2 simply calculates the amount of energy contained in
> any amount of matter, such as the pencil sitting on your desk.
[snip crap]
You are an idiot.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: OsherD: "Re: Solving For Potential From E = wLF"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?"
- In reply to: Keith P Walsh: "Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Lost Mass in Chemical Reactions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|