Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?

From: Qion (physicsofchi_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/30/05 

Date: 30 Jan 2005 15:29:46 -0800

AaronB wrote:

>
> I think they were telling you to go take some introductory physics
> courses instead of jumping from one crank theory to another.

I have to jump from one seemingly "crank theory" to another to
look for hint or clue of the physics of qi. The present Standard
model is either incomplete or may be wrong.

>
> > The American physicist is saying that magnetic monopoles exist.
> > But current instruments can detect them because they exist in the
> > V > C domain.
>
> I assume you want to say "current instruments can't detect them"

Yes. Exactly.

>
> > You may say it's absurd because the mass would be
> > infinite at speed of light and imaginary beyond. But what if we
> > are dealing with a mass or substance that does not follow the law
> > of relativity??
>
> Well, first, relativity isn't a law. It's a theory. The two words
mean
> two completely different things. Second, I don't think it is possible
> for an object to not follow relativistic physics, since relativity is
a
> property of spacetime, not the object.

I mean special relativity.. about light... Einstein said nothing
that go faster than light... and objects can't be made to
light speed because the mass would become infinite. But what
if an exotic substance or mass already started out at the
speed of light since the beginning of the universe, then it
doesn't violate special relativity.

>
> There is no evidence to support the existence of Qi, so your point is
> moot.

Here is some physical effect of qi that can even control the
rate of radioactive decay forward or backward.

http://www.accessv.com/~yuan/yansci/time/2002_YanXin_Qigong_JSE.pdf

A person told me that qi may be neutrinos as concentration
of this can affect radioactive decays. Is there experimental
finding what would happen if you focus intense neutrinos
to radioactive substance. Will it increase their decay
rate? Supposed, just supposed qi could really affect
radioactive decay rate. What's the principles that can do
that (just for the sake of discussion).

>
> That's very nice, but there is no evidence to support this assertion.
> What is this scientist's name again?

William Tiller Ph.D. A top US qi researcher.

> > The etheric wave counterpart of the
> > photon *may be* the explanation for how the photon can interfere
> > with itself because the etheric wave travels at V > C and it can
> > communicate this to its physical photon counterpart
>
> Interference is a property of waves. It is well understood without
the
> need for so-called "etheric waves."

The commentor is saying that the wave part is a property of
etheric something... like this is how superluminal communications
can occur in Bell's Theorem performed by Alain Aspect which
shows communication can occur faster than light. This may
be thru the agency of etheric wave.

>
> Quantum mechanics explains itself very well without etheric matter,
> thank you very much.

When it was realized nearly a hundred years ago that moving
charges lost energy. They thought orbiting electrons can't
be right. But since electrons are outside the nucleus. How
do they behave. Then Schrodinger and Born nail Quantum
Theory when they say it has something to do with probability
wave or amplitude. Now what really does the wave represent.
It's not a real wave. Why is QM like that. It may be
because matter is really dual with behavior of particle
and wave with the latter having something to do with
the etheric counterpart. While classical things like
water wave can occur, the agency of etheric wave is for
superluminal communication. We qi healer can detect
that all objects have etheric counterpart. What if photon
has an etheric counterpart too that is what creates its
seeming superluminal behavior. Ordinary photons can be
light speed but if you can control its etheric counterpart,
it may explain the Alain Aspect experiment and others
where faster than light properties seem to be occuring.

>
> > I know qi has some relationship with electromagnetic field
> > because power lines can produce or interact with qi.
>
> Then Qi is an electromagnetic effect, and would be easily detectable.
> Do you know of any experiments that have tested this?

It is related to electromagnetic. What Tiller is saying is
that magnetic monopoles existed in ordinary electromagnetic
but it being located in the etheric domain. This means
our current instruments can only detect the EM part and
not the Magnetoelectric part which is invisible to
scientists like you but which we qi healers can detect.
Anyway. Here's what Tiller described them (note the
he is referring to physical and etheric realm when he
refers to "these conjugate 4-spaces":

*These conjugate 4-spaces are thought to bear a special
"mir­ror" type relationship to each other, one being of the
distance-time v­ariety and the other being of its inverse (a
frequency domain). The for­mer is the home of the electric
matter of positive mass travelling at v­elocities slower
than the speed of light, c, while the latter is the h­ome of
magnetic matter of negative mass travelling at velocities
fa­ster than the speed of light, c. Images of the magnetic
charges in the­ "mirror" form magnetic dipoles in the
distance-time-domain so that th­e interaction of the
electric charges with these magnetic dipole images co­nstitute
our convensional electromagnetism. Images of the electric
ch­arges in the "mirror" form electric dipoles in the frequency
domain so th­at the interaction of the magnetic charges with
the electric dipole­ images constitute another field of the
magnetoelectric variety in t­hat domain that is not observable
by our convensional senses. To a clos­e approximation,
the configuration of magnetic substance in the frequency
dom­ain bears a "Fourier Transform" type of relationship
with the co­nfiguration of electric substance in the
distance-time domain. It is the interaction between
these "matters", as viewed from the distance-time si­de of
the "mirror", that constitutes what we presently called Quan­tum
Mechanics. Further, it is precisely the direct space/inverse­
space pair of coordinate frames that lead to the wave/particle
dua­lity manifestations of nature on a microscopic level.".

>
> > Sensitives
> > can still emit or work with qi even when inside a faraday's cage
> > whereas all their abilities disappear when inside magnetic
> > shielding area.. according to researches by scientists who
> > studied the sensitives.
>
> Do you have a link to these studies?

I'll find them and give it to you later.

> > Look. Physicists can hypothesize about
> > QM Many worlds interpretations or even the M-Theory idea of
> > parallel universes where each brane is composed of one universe.
>
> I have never heard of a theory that suggests the brain is composed of
> one universe. That seems rather foolish, actually. All of these
> theories are exactly that though: hypothesis. There is no
experimental
> evidence to support them.

Funny. Not brain, but brane or membrane. The august 2000 issue
of Scientific American has these physicists saying that our
universe form one membrane and parallel universe may be
another membrane located just 1 millimeter away, and the
reason smoke rising doesn't disappear into the another
universe is because our 3D world is in a membrane. If you will
read it. Tiller hypotheses about etheric and physical thing
is less far off.

> For the record, by the way, did you come here about a year ago under
> the name cinquirer asking about Qi?
>
> A.
>
> >
> > Qion

Because a year ago I wanted to understand the physics of qi. Then
I thought I could understand it better by studying neuroscience
and biology so I spend last year studying about non-physics
subjects to enable me to understand the physics of qi better.
Now i'm back to understand the physics of qi.

Qion

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle
    ... > which you can pick from a menu, physics is a monolithic edifice of ... > dynamics is governed by a wave function. ... >> I can accomodate the more unusual quantum interpretation ... > The elastic scattering differential cross section of electrons on ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The densities of a subatomic particle
    ... That's quite old physics, still cluttered with old points of view. ... Only the bare electrons figuring in the QED Lagrangian are pointlike. ... see the entry ''How real is the wave function?'' in the ... particle, it depends on its state only. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?
    ... > look for hint or clue of the physics of qi. ... > speed of light since the beginning of the universe, ... > be thru the agency of etheric wave. ... But since electrons are outside the nucleus. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: What is luminiferous ether made of?
    ... >> physics which are approximations describing the collective motion of ... the wave equation for light is used as ... If you use the lorentz metric, you also get galilean relativity as ... One can also define a meaning for distance that isn't ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle
    ... which you can pick from a menu, physics is a monolithic edifice of ... >> occupying closely similar wave functions. ... The elastic scattering differential cross section of electrons on ...
    (sci.physics)