Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
From: David Thomson (news5_at_volantis.org)
Date: 01/05/05
- Next message: Old Man: "Re: heat energy OR cold energy???"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Next in thread: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Reply: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:08:04 -0600
"Bjoern Feuerbacher" <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message
news:cre08v$flm$4@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de...
>> I have presented a scientifically derived system of physics that better
>> describes the fundamental observations of the Universe than does the
>> Standard Model.
>
> What, exactly, are "the fundamental observations of the Universe"?
Read the book someday. You ask good questions, but you ask more than I have
time to answer. In general, though, the fundamental observations are its
quantum structure, the Gforce that drives it, and the dark matter that feeds
it.
Dave
- Next message: Old Man: "Re: heat energy OR cold energy???"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Next in thread: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Reply: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Reply: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
