Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc.
From: Old Man (nomail_at_nomail.net)
Date: 01/05/05
- Next message: Henri Wilson: "Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity of Light and Matter"
- Previous message: Angelo: "Re: Relative Binding Energy vs Stability"
- In reply to: FrediFizzx: "Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc."
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:57:49 -0600
"FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:33sa5dF43u11sU1@individual.net...
> "Old Man" <nomail@nomail.net> wrote in message
> news:6JqdndIRcLEhMkXcRVn-jw@prairiewave.com...
> |
> | "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> | news:33obteF419g76U1@individual.net...
> | > "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> | > news:cr6mn8$t61$4@hercules.btinternet.com...
> | > |
> | > | "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> | > | news:33maj0F41ejciU1@individual.net...
> | > | > "Old Man" <nomail@nomail.net> wrote in message
> | > | > news:d-GdnZ2B8u-TfUjcRVn-ug@prairiewave.com...
> | > | > |
> | > | > | "Emwizsoon" <emwizsoon@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> | > | > | news:1104532102.456024.271670@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> | > |
> | > | Note for Emwizsoon:
> | > |
> | > | You should really disregard anything FrediFizzx has to say if you
> | > | intend to form a real undrstanding of physics. There is occasional
> | > | value in some of the things he talks about, but by and large he is
> an
> | > | interloper with cranky ideas which will simply mislead you.
> | > |
> | > | For that reason I have snipped the rest of this thread.
> | >
> | >
> | > Note for Emwizsoon:
> | >
> | > As you can plainly see, both Old Man and Franz refuse to
> | > properly discuss the physics of this situation.
> |
> | FizzX isn't addressing the physics.
> |
> | Franz and Old Man have addressed the physics: Free
> | space has only one observable property: the speed
> | of light. There's no physics in
> |
> | c^2 = 1 / x * y
> |
> | Whereof one arbitrarily chooses a value for x, and
> | then calculates y. x and y aren't physical quantities.
> | They aren't measured and aren't measurable.
> |
> | FizzX hasn't addressed measurability, thereby evading
> | the physics.
>
>
> Baloney!
>
> c^2 = Cvac/Lvac in cgs units.
>
> It is as simple as measuring length.
>
> FrediFizzx
Yup. As simple as, 5^2 = 50 / 2= 100 / 4 = ....
Does FizzX have a preference ? A lucky number, perhaps ?
[Old Man]
- Next message: Henri Wilson: "Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity of Light and Matter"
- Previous message: Angelo: "Re: Relative Binding Energy vs Stability"
- In reply to: FrediFizzx: "Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc."
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
