Re: Electron energy levels force field
From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 01/08/05
- Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: 40M for Bush Inauguration and 15M for Tsunami Disaster WAS Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc."
- In reply to: Lawrence: "Re: Electron energy levels force field"
- Next in thread: Lawrence: "Re: Electron energy levels force field"
- Reply: Lawrence: "Re: Electron energy levels force field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Jan 2005 23:06:18 -0800
yes i can draw
anyway any drawing will be a methaphorick pictures
just keep in mind that all the crooks around you that dare to slaeak
against me
do not even dare to imagine somwething actual they are matemathics
parrots that present too abstract descriptions that are of little use
just because they are too abstract
i can say in a paraphrase on Einstein:
"God dinnt play abstract matemathics'
the abstract situationis just a coverup of *arrogant* again *arrogant
ignorants*
that are more personal politiciance than real scintists.
(thats why they are so 'successful 'in our society)
now to your question:
i would not call it a 'seed'
because a seed is something speric (more or less)
my ' nuc' that is described not only for hydrogen but
all laong the periodic table !!
i didnt stop at the iron element with the excuse of 'lack of computer
power
i went with it all laong the 92 elements with much data substantiatins
ie nuclar facts chemical facts cristallography etc
i will nott say the i substantiated it by the spectra data because....
i never invested in that area any efforth
but that does not put in shade the other acheivement
it cannot be done by a one mans work with limited resourses
others will go on with my model and will prevail at the long run.
so
the nuc is not a sphere
it is a longish shape sort of a 'rectangular pipe (from Fluorine
upward)
more exact an octaheder pipe'
composed by alpha particle quartets that make each quartet to be like
a section of a pipe
those quartets combine *linearily' more mad more
and thas where the menfeliev periodic table secret lies.
cant tell you here in a short description0
so we have not a sphere but something elongated
now the main 'trick' of all that story is
'The chain of orbitals' idea
ie orbitals that untill now pople thing only about juast one separted
orbitas
my discovery or if you like revolutionary findind is that:
*orbitals - even of diffeent ordwer and size- can *combile* to some
chain of orbitals!!*
if you got that you got the main point and breakthrough of my theory!!
ie
the chain of orbitals is not only of electrons
it enables nuclear and mediating orbitas and electron orbitals
to combine into one long chain!1
once you get it
the continuity of nuc to electron is not any more problem!
btw another revolutionary esential for advance finding
is
that the asumption of ' electron for each proton '
is right only for light elements!!!!!
that is realy something very difficult to digest but thats it acording
to my findings
and
the existing theory actually failes to disporove my claim
the existing theory in mumbling while trying todescribe all those
shells ans subshells
and as i saw that you as well are breaking your teet with the *right*
and cleaver questions about how can that be settled logicallt
it simply des not make sense thjat a nuc of say 90 protons
will so acurately control 90 electrons around it by
a mysterious 'remote control' that is actually not explained
and more important it remains just hand waving!!
no one can bring experimantal data to prove the existance
of 90 electrons in their shells ans 'subshells' untill the last of them
just a stupid crookish faily tale.
i think i will stop here and see how do you get it
and if you like it
we can go on with it
-----------
TIA
Y.Porat
---------------------
- Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: 40M for Bush Inauguration and 15M for Tsunami Disaster WAS Re: Bush accused of undermining the UN with aid coalition"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc."
- In reply to: Lawrence: "Re: Electron energy levels force field"
- Next in thread: Lawrence: "Re: Electron energy levels force field"
- Reply: Lawrence: "Re: Electron energy levels force field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|