Re: For Y.Porat from Sergey Karavashkin on Quantum Paradox
From: Y.Porat (maporat_at_012.net.il)
Date: 01/09/05
- Next message: webmaster_at_mistral.net: "Re: For Bill Hobba on QED"
- Previous message: John Schoenfeld: "Re: Physics and God??"
- In reply to: Sergey Karavashkin: "For Y.Porat from Sergey Karavashkin on Quantum Paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Jan 2005 03:01:15 -0800
Hi Sergey
thank you for your long ansewr
now let me hunbly note and excuse me fo sort of advising you:
you tend to make it 'too long' it seems that you have a lot of pacience
and time
you know as the vast scapes of Ucrine while you ollk at it and travel
in it
you can relax and think very lengthly
may be that is one of the secrets of the Rusian peole who could be so
thorough
and make big breakthroughs by long patient analysis.
but .....
our western civilization fo rgood and for worse is ,,......
The jet period' you know
anything is quick (and may be superficial)
so no reader i supose in this ng will real all your long articles
you must be much more concise!!
and get to the opint very quickly like in our modern Advertizing
systems
sometimes rather to start 'from the end ' !!!
from ther bottom line !
i didnt quite got what you sayed about the Vortex theory
anyway i never studied it and know noting about it
i did my work indelendantly and built a whole model of the nuc and the
atom.
now my Curclon is not valid only to the photon
itis hiding behing all my model atructure
*of the nuc *and the Atom*
it is my private understanding that this Circlon is actuall
the basic unit that the whole world of matter and forces is built of
!!!
this for instance is the base to my innovative idea of
'The chain of orbitals' (did any Russian scintist ever suggested the
idea
of ;'chain of orbitals' ???
it is a chain of orbitals while each basic orbital is actually composed
of those Circlons
now those strange orbutal have the strange property of the ability
to connect thenselves as a longish chain of orbitals
and ther you have a long chin that makes for instance the electron
btw lately i suggested the 'Eel model fo the electron'
something eel like flexible many shapes able
iof you get that idea than
absobtion of photons or emmiting of photons is self understandable
it is just 'pealing out' something that is built in the matter
ie emiting or absorbing of ------- Circlons.
very mathaphorically in a simila way that you are
absorbing and ejecting out Carbohydrates (:-)
because it is just a part of your own building.
oops
i stated to adopt your sytem of being too long (:-)
so back to photon refraction
if the photon is actually a conglomeration of permanently moving
Crclons
with the velocity of light
inside matter in closed orbitals (circles)
and if ejected somehow - in a forward hellix movement.
untill some particle 'particle shark' is swolowing it.
now
if photons are not just one corclon but many of them
who wonder that it can split and 'interfere with itself'
the frequency after the slit is the same for both splited parts
but ther mass is less than the original one
before entering the slit
oops i forgot to tell you that in my understanding
even the Circlon HAS MASS
enough untill here ???
Bye and TIA
Y.Porat
---------------------
- Next message: webmaster_at_mistral.net: "Re: For Bill Hobba on QED"
- Previous message: John Schoenfeld: "Re: Physics and God??"
- In reply to: Sergey Karavashkin: "For Y.Porat from Sergey Karavashkin on Quantum Paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|