Re: Feynman's fallacy
From: LawsonE (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 01/10/05
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter"
- Previous message: FrediFizzx: "Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc."
- In reply to: Matt Giwer: "Re: Feynman's fallacy"
- Next in thread: Rob Dekker: "Re: Feynman's fallacy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 21:13:26 -0700
"Matt Giwer" <jull43@tampabay.rOAr.com> wrote in message
news:vBmEd.229177$6w6.183151@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
[...]
> As to the center of the universe that is at T=0. But because of the finite
> and relatively identical velocity of light we cannot establish the X=Y=Z=0
> point. Because of relativity every place in space sees itself as the outer
> edge of the present -- and therefore the Vulcan Science Academy has
> concluded time travel is impossible.
Within controversial variations of the theoretical initial radius of the
universe, according to the Big Bang-style theories, T=0 MEANS that R = 0,
and that "everywhere" serves as an equally valid "center."
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Equal Amounts of Matter and Anti-Matter"
- Previous message: FrediFizzx: "Re: Physics Lessons for Seto, Retic, Sefton, Thomson, etc."
- In reply to: Matt Giwer: "Re: Feynman's fallacy"
- Next in thread: Rob Dekker: "Re: Feynman's fallacy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
