Re: speed of light constant

mikephilbin1966_at_yahoo.co.uk
Date: 01/10/05 

Date: 10 Jan 2005 12:30:22 -0800

Flipping the Vector of Physics

http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909014 I did read (who am I kidding, it was
light years beyond my understanding as well you knew) that paper about
how light falls twice as 'heavily' as a beam of particles. Thanks.
Though what relevance it has to a description of Universal Equilibrium
as proposed in the original post I don't know.

U.A. ... you're confident that the atom (which bit of it?) is the
source of gravity when gravity has never been found in the atom? Why do
you remain still so confident? Is it merely an act of faith that the
evidential system will out?

I like to (logically) think in a holistic fashion that atoms are formed
'from' Universal Equilibrium structures - super gravity structures
first, then galactic structures, then stellar structures... only then
are the forces strong enough for the atoms to form... this reversing of
the vector of physics (whatever that means) is, for me, the only
logical way to understand why light is not source-speed relative (I do
not agree with the argument that redshift shows all points of space
moving away from themselves, if it did, all things would show
red-shifted light). The light must be falling in to the energised
source, the light bulb, settling debts (at the speed of light). We can
see the speed of light here as the maximum speed that the Universe can
settle a debt, fill in a pit, call it what you like in layman's terms.

Yes, all I've done is flipped the vector of physics from the sub-atomic
to the Universal but I think as a mind experiment this must be done -
especially where GR is failing (still) to unify the sub-atomic and the
galactic. Maybe this thought experiment has been done before, if you
have links to a U.E. effect (not ether) I'd be happy also to read
through that.

Finally, do you have specific evidence that REFUTES this as a way to
think about the universe? Again, U.A. your guidance is always respected
in these matters.

Mike

Relevant Pages

  • (mechanical) Gravity
    ... Universal Forces - A. Gravity ... to bravely come back to physics of mechanics. ... The space in the universe is not empty. ... belief of scientists, neutrinos are very interactive. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: "A Universe Without Weak Interactions"
    ... Suppose you had a universe with almost the same laws of physics as ours, ... Pure helium won't form stars efficiently for this reason. ... Another interesting option is to weaken gravity, ... That is the heart of physics - The rest is details.- Robert Shaw ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
  • deriving speed of light from purely the inside of Plutonium atom Re:
    ... atom of 231Plutonium. ... >> far in all of this creating we do not bring into the picture physics. ... So if the Universe did not have atoms it would not have ... Gravity as we know it is only a localized force in this region of the Cosmos ...
    (sci.math)
  • deriving speed of light from purely the inside of Plutonium atom Re:
    ... atom of 231Plutonium. ... >> far in all of this creating we do not bring into the picture physics. ... So if the Universe did not have atoms it would not have ... Gravity as we know it is only a localized force in this region of the Cosmos ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Mass in E=mc^2
    ... What is c to gravity? ... > physics to understand and neither you nor Einstein can stop us. ... > how to understand the physics of this universe. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)