Re: Have a permanent colony on the moon now
From: habshi (habshi_at_anony.com)
Date: 01/12/05
- Next message: DrPostman: "Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: Is F=ma a definition or not?"
- In reply to: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Have a permanent colony on the moon now"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Have a permanent colony on the moon now"
- Reply: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Have a permanent colony on the moon now"
- Reply: habshi: "Re: Have a permanent colony on the moon now"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:54:41 GMT
>
The technology to get to the moon is now lost to history.<
I am not going to engage in name calling with you as I have
been well brought up.
How do you 'lose' a technology within thirty years ? Are the
manuals lost , have the scientists who know how to work rockets died
out ? Are you talking nonsense as usual ?
- Next message: DrPostman: "Re: Jim Oberg - Anti-Kook"
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: Is F=ma a definition or not?"
- In reply to: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Have a permanent colony on the moon now"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Have a permanent colony on the moon now"
- Reply: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Have a permanent colony on the moon now"
- Reply: habshi: "Re: Have a permanent colony on the moon now"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]