Re: Son du tonnerre
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 01/12/05
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Previous message: PD: "Re: Number of neutrons per proton?"
- In reply to: aliasjt: "Son du tonnerre"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Son du tonnerre"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Son du tonnerre"
- Reply: John Sefton: "Re: Son du tonnerre"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:09:11 -0800
aliasjt wrote:
>
> Dans le livre "oh la physique", assez décrié sur ce groupe, l'auteur
> prétend page 172 que le son du tonnerre se propage à une vitesse bien
> plus grande que celle du son, du fait de l'existence d'une onde
> d'explosion. On ne retrouve nulle part cette assertion. Quelqu'un
> peut-il m'éclairer - c'est le cas de le dire - sur ce sujet ?
National pride aside, the language of the Internet plus international
and technical discourses is English. I'm certain there are Chinese
characters for tetraphenylcyclopentadienone - and it's as deep purple
in Beijing as it is in Milwaukee - but I wouldn't want to the sorry
SOB memorizing 2000+ pages of Aldrich chemical catalog in technical
ideograms.
Speak White.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: kenseto: "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Previous message: PD: "Re: Number of neutrons per proton?"
- In reply to: aliasjt: "Son du tonnerre"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Son du tonnerre"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Son du tonnerre"
- Reply: John Sefton: "Re: Son du tonnerre"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|