Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion

From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 01/12/05 

Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:18:25 GMT

kenseto wrote:

>
> My theory is supported by experiments. The equation is a modified Newtomian
> equation.
>

   You don't even have a theory, Seto, but you sure do have a lot of
   immortal fumbles
     http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+fumble+site%3Ausers.pandora.be

   and you are a registered crank
     http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ken+H.+Seto%22+site%3Awww.crank.net

   and nobody is interested in your crackpot ideas, as they lack any real
   scientific basis.

   You get pissed (not drunk) and call many of us runts... which seems to
   be more self descriptive of you!

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion
    ... kenseto wrote: ... The equation is a modified Newtomian ... You don't even have a theory, Seto, but you sure do have a lot of ... You get pissed (not drunk) and call many of us runts... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion
    ... > kenseto wrote: ... ROTFLOL....Wormy is a runt of the SR experts and a disgusting low-life ... gourmet puppy chow. ... Ken Seto ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion
    ... > kenseto wrote: ... ROTFLOL....Wormy is a runt of the SR experts and a disgusting low-life ... gourmet puppy chow. ... Ken Seto ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Speed of Light: A universal Constant?
    ... kenseto wrote: ... > SR says that the speed of light is a universal constant. ... Empirical data says that the speed of light is the same for all ... And thanks for registering at crank dot net, Seto. ...
    (sci.physics)