Re: Is F=ma a definition or not?
From: Mike (eleatis_at_yahoo.gr)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: radius of a free neutron"
- Previous message: Douglas Eagleson: "Re: Why does Gaithersburg vibrate?"
- In reply to: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Is F=ma a definition or not?"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: Is F=ma a definition or not?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Jan 2005 08:46:30 -0800
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:
[snip]
>
> F = ma is an equation, not an identity. A big difference.
[snip]
That would be true if and only if F, m, and "a" could be meaured
independently of one another.
Actually, it is an identity in physics. It is an equation in math. It a
good idea to know the difference. A big difference.
Mike
> Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
> meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the
same"
- Next message: tj Frazir: "Re: radius of a free neutron"
- Previous message: Douglas Eagleson: "Re: Why does Gaithersburg vibrate?"
- In reply to: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Is F=ma a definition or not?"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: Is F=ma a definition or not?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|