Re: radius of a free neutron
From: tj Frazir (GravityPhysics_at_webtv.net)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: No aether = no logic"
- Previous message: John Sefton: "Re: Black Hole Thoughts & Calculations Required"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: radius of a free neutron"
- Next in thread: Y.Porat: "Re: radius of a free neutron"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:12:51 -0500
In billard ball idiots physics..
you nead a stupid glue-on .
The paper atom has more parts and strange magic energies ...the real
atom cant be drawn on a 100 mile wide page with a sharp pencil.
In te drawing the nutron knocks out 2 neutrons . Like a stupid pool
game.
But a real atom is 60 miles wide and the nutron is a locomotive engine
orbiting a pit.
The chance you ever even hit a nutron orbiting a pit would be slim.
You lack the mass to make a direct hit in a pit.
If it was as small as a photon it would orbit with the electron and
combine with the mass.
A nutron is a billion times bigger than a photon.
It will role down and orbit its way down the pit .
That much mass might be obsorbed and orbit the pit ,,if the mass
combined wount orbit the pit then th mass that wount orbit will change
directions because it cant go faster.
Its allready going as fast as it can.
Then mass bacomes radius.
The direct converting of energy from mass to radius is where all the
massive energy ( glue ) came from.
Its a ballance of mass and pit.
A notron never hits a nutron.
The ballance of mass energy changes as the energy of the mass.
2 nutrons could not speed up when the pit
and orbit ballance and ejected.
Thats massive energy .
Imagine snapping the string and the rock flying from its radius.
Imagine the instant gain in speed as you drop another rock down the
string befor it snapped.
The string was tighter than ALs ass in orbit
and you double its mass in the same fixed orbit held by the string. (
string is gravity )
The mass wants to then orbit faster or change the orbit radius .
But this mass cant go faster ..so it will change orbit identical to
its mass.
G ,,gravity increased the pit ,,now evrything in orbit is pulled
harder by the string.
None of the orbits are in ballance and they are pulled in and nead to
speed up..
If it cant speed up,,the sudden pull in will cause them to change
directions and eject the orbit.
the more mass in orbit the heavier the atom.
.....
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: No aether = no logic"
- Previous message: John Sefton: "Re: Black Hole Thoughts & Calculations Required"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: radius of a free neutron"
- Next in thread: Y.Porat: "Re: radius of a free neutron"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
