Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905

From: Ken S. Tucker (dynamics_at_vianet.on.ca)
Date: 01/13/05 

Date: 13 Jan 2005 14:25:47 -0800

Bilge wrote:
> Ken S. Tucker,
...
> >That definition allows nonsymmetrical metrics, and subsumes
> >the potentials, which need relativity, and eliminates gauge
> >invariance, because voltage is real over a finite distance.

> So, let me see... I hardly know

You getting warm

>where to begin, but basically,
> you think general relativity needs to be reformulated in terms
> of a non-symmetric metric because the reality of a non-relativistic,
> non-quantum mechanical concept of voltage and the necessity of
> not conserving charge demands it?

You're getting colder
...

>I have a hard time

Bilge, one word, rectal dysfunction, try Viagra.

If you would take physics more seriously than a
*dabbler*, you might not be so frustrated.
Ken

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Androcles and Draper resume Einstein 1905
    ... >>invariance, because voltage is real over a finite distance. ... > you think general relativity needs to be reformulated in terms ... Bilge, one word, rectal dysfunction, try Viagra. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relativity is not a theory about relative motion ?
    ... Bilge wrote: ... Relativity is not about motion. ... It's about invariance. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relativity is not a theory about relative motion ?
    ... >> Relativity is not a theory about relative motion. ... >Bilge, ... Relativity is not about motion. ... It's about invariance. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Bilges logic (was: Einsteins logic)
    ... >| something one could accuse Bilge of - he snips relevant material ... >stated the Andersen Transforms and can no longer claim "mutual time ... >about relativity and come into the newsgroup with questions for which they ... >| than being rude (although I still see no reason for that) and certainly ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SRT lesson
    ... >>As these gentlemen do not know SRT, but claim otherwise, I must ... > As I've already pointed out, special relativity can be ... > be unchanged by an infinitesimal displacement: ... Bilge, that formula is unbalanced, ie double talk. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)