Re: On Planck's constant
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 01/15/05
- Next message: via Userbeam Remailer: "Re: Having problems with This Google Groups Beta Thingie ;-)"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Oily ocean on Titan"
- In reply to: Tim Golden: "Re: On Planck's constant"
- Next in thread: RP: "Re: On Planck's constant"
- Reply: RP: "Re: On Planck's constant"
- Reply: Tim Golden: "Re: On Planck's constant"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:16:06 -0800
Tim Golden wrote:
>
> Well if you are claiming that everything is just peachy keen now then I
> would have to disagree. There are opportunities for new theories. The
> book is not done being written.
Fine. Tell us what is empirically or theoretically deficient in
contemporary physics.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: via Userbeam Remailer: "Re: Having problems with This Google Groups Beta Thingie ;-)"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: Oily ocean on Titan"
- In reply to: Tim Golden: "Re: On Planck's constant"
- Next in thread: RP: "Re: On Planck's constant"
- Reply: RP: "Re: On Planck's constant"
- Reply: Tim Golden: "Re: On Planck's constant"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|