Re: Energy, Entropy, And The Meaning Of Fundamental

From: glbrad01 (glbrad01_at_insightbb.com)
Date: 01/16/05 

Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:38:36 GMT

"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:rHhGd.8806$OF5.3575@attbi_s52...
> glbrad01 wrote:
>> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
>> news:tOaGd.8394$EG1.2920@attbi_s53...
>>
>>>glbrad01 wrote:

(snip)

>>>>Brad
>>>
>>>ILLUCID GARBAGE
>>>
>>
>>
>> No more illucid than leaping forward in time to meet your child who is
>> older than you are, then leaping back in time to meet your grandfather
>> who is younger than you are. No more illucid than the Big Bang something
>> from nothing and for nothing accelerating in expansion into nothing. No
>> more illucid than one-dimensional infinite with no gauge of
>> infinitesimal, infinities, finites, or constants. No illucid than
>> eventual uniform cold without any such thing as heat for gauge. No more
>> illucid than heat that was without any such thing as cold for gauge.
>>
>> No more illucid than "closed but unbounded" and there being no such
>> thing as open for gauge. No more illucid than "colors" that aren't
>> colors, "flavors" that aren't flavors. No more illucid than length,
>> width, height, and time, there being no such thing as spatial depth. No
>> more illucid than the Universe being two-dimensionally flat with there
>> being no such thing as volume.
>>
>> No more illucid than being told that there is only one dimension to
>> time, relativity.
>>
>> No more illucid than being told that when you enter the realms of
>> relativity and quantum mechanics you have leave logic and common sense
>> behind. No more illucid than the confusion, chaos, and internal war that
>> has been the physics establishment for over a century and is the physics
>> establishment today.
>>
>> No more illucid than the 1-dimensional string and its musical notes
>> vibrating in....no gauging environment whatsoever.
>>
>> You're not ignorant Sam, neither is "Uncle Al," but both of you are
>> arrogantly stupid and brutishly mindless, fatally so. Mindless rather
>> than brainless.
>>
>> Brad
>
> Is that so? Perhaps it is your lack of physics education.
> You would know.
>
>

  And you still don't get it. I'll give another lesson in description from
the four dimensions of time I've described. You couldn't even see your lamp
across the room much less a star or the Andromeda galaxy far more distant if
it weren't for an absolute dimension of time. The timeless dimension, or
zero. In order for light to transmit information across any distance in
space whatsoever, and up through time into the bargain, information must be
rendered timeless so that it arrives more or less as a precise description
of the source propagator at the time of propagation and the distance-time
from an observer.

  Time then must have a dimension of zero in order to capture events in
frozen frames and time stamp them. It must have a dimension of history
(histories) in order progressively keep that time stamp negative to now and
fixed to a specified distance-time as light travels across any distance; and
as time advances. It has to KNOW where the leading edge of light is (at its
own extending length in distance from the time of the event that created
it), and it has to KNOW where the leading edge of time is (for the same
reason given).

  The good physicists that can think have written that anyone can realize
the right visualization of the Universe and differing things having to do
with it. Stephen Hawking stated outright that the established modeling of
the Universe at large could be as wrong as wrong can get for the simple
reason we aren't traveling around in the Universe, to various positions at
various velocities, to verify the modeling we are doing. Physicist Marc
Davis who worked at the accelerator near Chicago said during a conference on
string theory that at this time "we KNOW next to nothing about the
Universe." Albert Einstein said in "Relativity" that his theories, and the
findings seeming to validate them, were still valid only circumstantially,
not valid across the board.

  These physicists knew, and know, what "relativity" means, which is why
they have never attacked anyone for having their own "relative view" that
disagrees with them and the established model. String theorists especially
have to watch out concerning attacking anyone else's views because it has
come up with a lot of very weird things and views, extending all the way to
extremely weird universes, as findings. Any one of them, or all of them,
could be the reality beyond or outside of "relativity to the observer."
Chaos Theory, too, is coming increasingly online extending itself into more
areas than before threatening to reinterpret things.

  My travelers beyond observed apparent travelers, positioned beyond
observed apparent position, is a phenomenon I've found occasionally
mentioned now in articles by astronomers working with Hubble, Chandra, and
so on, apparently scratching their heads over it. They are finding
peripheral event activity seeming to indicate some major bodies out there
might be out ahead of their apparent locations in space and in time (out
ahead of where and when they are observed to be). I've been describing and
explaining that phenomena for years and years now. Practitioners trained to
too fine a point in Relativity take observation to be instantaneous with
regard to position and velocity across any distance whatsoever in outer or
inner space and in time. I have emphatically stated in many posts over many
years that the speed of light, regarding information transmission across
distance, flatly forbids such a thing being the case.

  Try to tell me it isn't the case and I will refer you to the "time
slowing" evidence that it is the case. That is a phenomena of observation
"relative to an observer." It isn't the reality because whatever being
observed is neither where nor when it is observed to be. That whatever being
observed--at the time it is being observed--is out ahead (in advance of) of
its apparent, its observed, location in space and in time. Having to do with
this same phenomenon, I've just begun trying to re-visualize--for
myself--the what, where, when, how and why of, particularly, peripheral
blackholes always companion to one or more (to many more) major light
propagating bodies. If we could be on the spot there and now, wherever, we
might [possibly] discover the major light propagating bodies and their
companion blackholes are actually one and the same gravitational body or
bodies.

  There being no such thing as "zero-g" (there being only "micro-gravity")
means that one Mars-g and one Earth-g are not one and the same measure of
"one gravity." Therefore one billionth, or one trillionth, or one
quintillionth, of one Mars-g, and one billionth, or one trillionth, or one
quintillionth, of one Earth-g, cannot be the same one billionth, one
trillionth, of one quintillionth, of "one gravity."

  A celestial body with its "one gravity" being a gravity one million, or
one billion, or one trillion, and so on, times one Earth-g, cannot have the
measure of one millionth, or one billionth, or one trillionth, and so on,
"one gravity" be the same "micro-gravity" as it is for one Earth-g or one
Mars-g. One Earth-g and one Mars-g must be micro-gravity indistinguishable
from zero-g relative to that celestial body.

  Since the acceleration rate of gravity (such as "32 feet per second per
second") measures how rapid the increase, or decrease, in velocity, then a
simple (albeit vast) increase or decrease in the velocity of a traveler will
reset his relationship to any numbers of gravities up or down to one-g
and/or zero-g regarding the numbers, therefore resetting all fundamental
forces' comparitive strength value proportionality; in turn moving him up or
down into some other plane of universe (moving him into some other universe)
than the one he was in before. I've wandered what the force horizon would
have to be to change spatial universes. I should have known it would be
gravity since gravity is the fabric of space: both causing the existence of
spatial dimensionality and at once
alternatively...inter-dimensionally...being its fourth dimension of 'depth'
(as in real, true, "deep space").

  We talk about "0 to x-mph (or x-kph)" velocities on Earth without a
thought about outer space velocity possibilities. The "0" in "0 to x-mph (or
x-kph)" is meaningless in outer space. In outer space, a traveler can get
negative (all the way to very negative) in velocity to that velocity
absolute of "0" on Earth. And, of course, he can get positive to that
velocity. The two won't be one and the same. So far as I know I've never
read anything about the possibility of a traveler in space going negative in
velocity relative to zero on Earth.

  If one could transfer that more than probable entity--existing at negative
velocity relative to Earth-zero--to the surface of the Earth, say in a
confined, contained, environment such as a particle accelerator, what might
that particular particle appear to be relative to Earth-zero [positioning]
and to Earth-positive [velocity]? What might it appear to be?!?!

Brad

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Time Machine
    ... Now comes the moving clock around the ... |> corner and the resting observer says: "Hey, ... 2AB/= c to be a universal constant- the velocity of light in empty ... | In fact the principle of relativity - and the theory - require the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
    ... "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity" ... It is recognized that Special Relativity provides the Lorentz ... This term is provided as the "Space Transformation". ... an observer in B measures the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
    ... "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity" ... It is recognized that Special Relativity provides the Lorentz ... This term is provided as the "Space Transformation". ... an observer in B measures the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
    ... "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity" ... It is recognized that Special Relativity provides the Lorentz ... This term is provided as the "Space Transformation". ... an observer in B measures the ...
    (sci.physics.fusion)
  • "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
    ... "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity" ... It is recognized that Special Relativity provides the Lorentz ... This term is provided as the "Space Transformation". ... an observer in B measures the ...
    (sci.physics.particle)