Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion
From: FrediFizzx (fredifizzx_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/19/05
- Next message: Lewis Mammel: "Re: The Hammer & The Feather"
- Previous message: Allan Adler: "Re: Inelastic Light Scattering?"
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:36:08 -0800
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote in
message news:HPlHd.4566$hu.992@fed1read01...
| Dear FrediFizzx:
|
| "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| news:3566uiF4i1fkgU1@individual.net...
| > "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote in
| > message news:c4lHd.4554$hu.3998@fed1read01...
| ...
| > | What if your quantum objects actually have NO geometry whatsoever, by
| > | themselves? Detection might rely on multiples to be "coincident"...
| >
| > That is fine if they have NO particular intrinsic geometry for
| > themselves.
| > Let them be point-like. It is the geometry of their interactions that
is
| > important as this geometry is what defines spacetime. Take a bunch of
| > point-like massless or very near massless particles and let them all go
| > with
| > some initial tremendous energy. What is going to happen? I bet they
get
| > into some kind of regular pattern.
|
| Something that agglomerates to mass, establishes length and time as
| byproducts, perhaps. But below this, no geometry can be inferred, no
| reason for a "regular pattern". Not unless there is a force system to
| spread 'em out.
The original energy of the "big bang" is the force. Then there maybe is a
counteracting force by "linkages" between the interacting particles of the
medium. IOW, the BB tries to spread them out, but because of the way the
geometry of their interactions happens, they are "linked" together resisting
against the BB initial force. If not this, then there has to be an
"outside" force. An "evolved" black hole in a bigger Universe?
| Is energy released/absorbed when the quarks of which a proton are made are
| assembled?
Relative to what? Hmm... What is an example of a proton being made? The
only thing we really have to go by is free neutrons decaying to a proton,
electron and anti-electron neutrino. If we create a proton from spacetime,
then an anti-proton should be created also. So energy must be added to
spacetime. But I would imagine at the beginning of the BB there was a
greater probability for protons to be created from spacetime. Of course a
big mystery is where are all the anti-protons? If there are very few
anti-protons compared to protons then there must be some imbalance in the
geometry of spacetime. I think the key is the "dual space" concept for this
imbalance. A quote from our paper at the links in the sig.:
"Melnikov proved with rigorous math, based on hyper-complex numbers, that
the world which surrounds us is the one unified entity of the right-handed
(Euclidian, linear) and left-handed (Minkowsky-Riemann, hyperbolic, with
variable metrics) space-time."
FrediFizzx
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
- Next message: Lewis Mammel: "Re: The Hammer & The Feather"
- Previous message: Allan Adler: "Re: Inelastic Light Scattering?"
- In reply to: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: A Doable Experiment to Detect Absolute Motion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
