Re: Taking Apart Quantum Mechanics, etc.
From: Ken S. Tucker (dynamics_at_vianet.on.ca)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: John C. Polasek: "Re: Taking Apart Standard Model or extending it?"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Taking Apart Quantum Mechanics, etc."
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Taking Apart Quantum Mechanics, etc."
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Taking Apart Quantum Mechanics, etc."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Jan 2005 18:37:32 -0800
Yes Gregory,
My attitude to take a hard look at definitions,
in a way I think Einstein improved our definitions
that in hindsight look colloquial from Newton's
PoV.
I was elated when the ISU adopted L=cT,
to interdefine the meter, speed of light, and
the second, in my lifetime.
That's why you might see me pushing for a
concensus relating a Kilogram to the second.
Good for you!
Ken S. Tucker
- Next message: John C. Polasek: "Re: Taking Apart Standard Model or extending it?"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- In reply to: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Taking Apart Quantum Mechanics, etc."
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Taking Apart Quantum Mechanics, etc."
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Taking Apart Quantum Mechanics, etc."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
