Re: Wind energy extraction
jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Previous message: Old Man: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- In reply to: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Next in thread: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Reply: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
In sci.physics habshi <habshi@anony.com> wrote:
> >You also ignore, or don't know (which is highly likely) that the wind
> is much slower close to the ground, as in up to about 5 meters or so.<
> OK it will be balanced at its center point on a pole . A $10
> chip will ensure the large funnel opening will always be pointed into
> the wind . Even during still days , the pressure and temp difference
> between the wide and narrow ends will create wind power .
How many people have to tell you a 5 M windmill without the silly
funnel is cheaper and produces more power?
Your inane $10 chip still would need expensive sensors and motors to
position this silly contraption in the wind.
You are an idiot.
-- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply.
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Previous message: Old Man: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- In reply to: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Next in thread: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Reply: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]