Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space
From: glbrad01 (glbrad01_at_insightbb.com)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: jessie: "Re: 4 prohumanist continued"
- Previous message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: channel_at_mistral.net: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: Old Man: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: harald.vanlintel_at_epfl.ch: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:18:24 GMT
No observer can ever observe space. He, per the speed of light's
limitations in transmitting information through, is totally blind to space.
He can only observe a light-time history frame arriving within his frame,
period. A traveler travels through space, but he will never observe that
travel through space either. He will observe travel through time. Light
transmits information but it takes time to get where it is going, whether a
minute fraction of a second or billions of years or more, thus it will get
behind in time, farther and ever farther behind in time, to the real space
and time of where and what it departed.
I've illustrated this again and again. Herein the illustration is for a
lamp and observer in exactly the same frame of reference separated by only a
little distance. It works the same though no matter where.
History = hy
Immediate Time = t
Source(t1)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Observer(t1)
Source(t2), hy1, >>>>>>>>>>Observer(t2)
Source(t3), hy2, hy1, >>>>>>>Observer(t3)
Source(t4), hy3, hy2, hy1, >>>>Observer(4)
Source(t5), hy4, hy3, hy2, (hy1)Observer(t5)
Source(t6), hy5, hy4, hy3, (hy2)Observer(t6)
Source(t7), hy6, hy5, hy4, (hy3)Observer(t7)
The observer believes himself to be observing in a space-time environment
but he is a blind man (all life is) when it comes to space beyond his
ability to touch it. He observes in a strict light-time history frame
environment when it comes to sight. Even having to do with the computer
screen you are viewing right now--that you believe you are viewing
instantaneously in real time, you are behind in time to the phsyical
screen's real space and time. When it comes to motion and travel, concerning
anything going away from his location at any angle and velocity, the
observer in observing the traveler will always suffer from light's velocity
frame dragging effect, whether slightly or hugely. Since the observer can
never observe space, a traveler will never be where an observer observes him
to be because all the observer observes is history and the traveler has
since--to long since--moved on in both space (unobservable) and time
(unobserved). This "since moved on..." negates all "time slowing." It
cancels it out. It will always be as if the intrinsic traveler is on the
other side of the speed of light taking advantage of that effect to
constantly cancel out the apparent traveler's "time slowing."
Brad
- Next message: jessie: "Re: 4 prohumanist continued"
- Previous message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: Van Flandern & Rethinking Relativity?"
- Next in thread: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: channel_at_mistral.net: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: Old Man: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Reply: harald.vanlintel_at_epfl.ch: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|