Re: spring/shock absorber has "reactance"?
From: Fred Abse (excretatauris_at_cerebrumconfus.it)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: What_is_Qi: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Previous message: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- In reply to: Airy R.Bean: "Re: spring/shock absorber has "reactance"?"
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: spring/shock absorber has "reactance"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 14:24:27 +0000
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:18:16 +0000, Airy R.Bean top posted:
> A shock absorber that moves other than in a straight line is an MOT
> failure.
>
> "Jonathan Barnes" <jbarnes6@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:csrio2$8je$1@titan.btinternet.com...
>> Shock absorbers are non linear.
I think he was referring to transfer function, not mechanical alignment.
Anyway, what about lever-type shock absorbers?
--
Then there's duct tape ...
(Garrison Keillor)
- Next message: What_is_Qi: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Previous message: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- In reply to: Airy R.Bean: "Re: spring/shock absorber has "reactance"?"
- Next in thread: John Larkin: "Re: spring/shock absorber has "reactance"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]