Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space
channel_at_mistral.net
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: What_is_Qi: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Previous message: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- In reply to: glbrad01: "Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:41:58 +0000
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:18:24 GMT, "glbrad01" <glbrad01@insightbb.com>
wrote:
> No observer can ever observe space. He, per the speed of light's
>limitations in transmitting information through, is totally blind to space.
>He can only observe a light-time history frame arriving within his frame,
>period. A traveler travels through space, but he will never observe that
>travel through space either. He will observe travel through time. Light
>transmits information but it takes time to get where it is going, whether a
>minute fraction of a second or billions of years or more, thus it will get
>behind in time, farther and ever farther behind in time, to the real space
>and time of where and what it departed.
>
> I've illustrated this again and again. Herein the illustration is for a
>lamp and observer in exactly the same frame of reference separated by only a
>little distance. It works the same though no matter where.
>
>History = hy
>Immediate Time = t
>
>Source(t1)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Observer(t1)
>Source(t2), hy1, >>>>>>>>>>Observer(t2)
>Source(t3), hy2, hy1, >>>>>>>Observer(t3)
>Source(t4), hy3, hy2, hy1, >>>>Observer(4)
>Source(t5), hy4, hy3, hy2, (hy1)Observer(t5)
>Source(t6), hy5, hy4, hy3, (hy2)Observer(t6)
>Source(t7), hy6, hy5, hy4, (hy3)Observer(t7)
>
> The observer believes himself to be observing in a space-time environment
>but he is a blind man (all life is) when it comes to space beyond his
>ability to touch it. He observes in a strict light-time history frame
>environment when it comes to sight. Even having to do with the computer
>screen you are viewing right now--that you believe you are viewing
>instantaneously in real time, you are behind in time to the phsyical
>screen's real space and time. When it comes to motion and travel, concerning
>anything going away from his location at any angle and velocity, the
>observer in observing the traveler will always suffer from light's velocity
>frame dragging effect, whether slightly or hugely. Since the observer can
>never observe space, a traveler will never be where an observer observes him
>to be because all the observer observes is history and the traveler has
>since--to long since--moved on in both space (unobservable) and time
>(unobserved). This "since moved on..." negates all "time slowing." It
>cancels it out. It will always be as if the intrinsic traveler is on the
>other side of the speed of light taking advantage of that effect to
>constantly cancel out the apparent traveler's "time slowing."
>
>Brad
>
Scary.
- Next message: What_is_Qi: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Previous message: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- In reply to: glbrad01: "Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Einstein's Observer Totally Blind To Space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
