Re: Rebuttal to Lesages Shadows (New mods on 1/20)

From: Timo Nieminen (timo_at_physics.uq.edu.au)
Date: 01/23/05 

Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:19:50 +1000

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, greywolf42 wrote:
> greywolf42 <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote:
> > A Rebuttal to the Claims in "Lesage's Shadows*"
> > *http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath131/kmath131.htm
>
> Shadow has made yet more changes to the "Shadows" webpage, on January 20th.
[cut]
> Shadow has once again deliberately distorted Le Sage's hypothesis. Le
> Sage's model is not complex, but Shadow can't seem to post anything remotely
> resembling it. From Roseveare, p 109

Why not reveal le Sage's hypothesis in all its glory by making it
available to all? Lucrece Newtonien is out-of-copyright, so you could
freely publish a translation, perhaps on www. Perhaps the Smithsonian
translation is out-of-copyright now as well. 

-- 
Timo
Quantcast