To Androcles about MMX

From: Sergey Karavashkin (selftrans_at_yandex.ru)
Date: 01/24/05 

Date: 24 Jan 2005 08:11:53 -0800

From:Androcles (dummy@dummy.net)
Subject:Re: To Androcles about MMX
Newsgroups:sci.physics
Date:2005-01-14 14:32:38 PST
 

"Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
news:a42650fc.0501141420.52f0aac5@posting.google.com...
> From:Androcles (dummy@dummy.net)
> Subject:Re: To Androcles about MMX
> Newsgroup:sci.physics
> Date:2005-01-09 12:37:30 PST
>
>
> "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
> news:a42650fc.0501081444.3bf612af@posting.google.com...
> [snip]
>
>> Happy New year,
>>
>> Sergey
>
> Androcles (dummy@dummy.net) wrote in message
> news:dCgEd.47671$C8.27690@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> You too, but I have to inform you that I do not have sufficent time to
> read
> all of your post. Please state in as few words as possible what your
> position
> is. In depth examination can follow once I understand where you are
> coming from.
> Androcles.
>
> Sergey:
>
> I referred you to some basic literature on MMX that proved aether wind
> real

Androcles wrote:

Hmm... well, take a look at this:
 http://www.androc1es.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

Androcles.

Sergey:

Thank you, Androcles, I will look at it and write later in details.
And you, if you can get the materials to which I referred you, read
them. Anyway, think of what I wrote you.

After first sight at your site, I would like to ask you. Do you really
think that the light velocity can be added to that of source? If so,
please substantiate this point phenomenologically in more details. By
the way I would notice, to be able to transform space-time, Einstein
'deleted' aether. And not in vain, as in material space the
propagation velocity of wave processes is strongly correlated with the
substance of this space. We can add velocities only in case of
material features. But then the velocities of these objects can vary
from zero to the light velocity. In wave representation, if we think
light to be a wave, this is impossible. If we think light to be
particles, there come to force my questions from which all supporters
of QM fly away. With your wish, I can write them for you. What is
important - QM is discrepant even to postulates of photon theory.
Substantiating, you would have to formulate a non-contradictive set of
postulates. I would be interesting, how will you cope, as I know, it
is impossible to formulate it. Not because I want it or not but quite
objectively.

Regards,

Sergey

Relevant Pages

  • To Androcles about MMX
    ... Subject: To Androcles about MMX ... Sergey comes from a land where there are functions with a ... Dirk Vdm ...
    (sci.physics)
  • To Androcles about MMX
    ... Subject: To Androcles about MMX ... > Sergey comes from a land where there are functions with a ... Throw a bun to ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: To Androcles about MMX
    ... > Sergey comes from a land where there are functions with a ... > Dirk Vdm ... Androcles' camp. ... aknowledge his mistakes into a way of life. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: To Androcles about MMX
    ... > Androcles wrote in message ... > I referred you to some basic literature on MMX that proved aether wind ... Hmm... ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: GPS GR Correction Myth.
    ... | Androcles wrote: ... when measured in the stationary system, with the velocity c-v..." ... Light with the Principle of Relativity. ... THERE is hardly a simpler law in physics than that according ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast