To Androcles about MMX
From: Sergey Karavashkin (selftrans_at_yandex.ru)
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: Sergey Karavashkin: "To Androcles about MMX"
- Previous message: John Sefton: "Re: neutrinos redshift?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Jan 2005 08:13:07 -0800
From:Dirk Van de moortel
(dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Subject:Re: To Androcles about MMX
Newsgroups:sci.physics
Date:2005-01-14 14:51:28 PST
"Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message news:a42650fc.0501141422.5a3fd8d4@posting.google.com...
[snip]
> Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com) wrote in message news:sphEd.26182$8o.1837174@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
>
> Sergey comes from a land where there are functions with a
> curl(grad) that severely differs from zero:
> http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=author%3Asergey+grad+curl
> With this in mind he might have a look at the orientation of
> your MMX mirrors:
> http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroMMX.html
>
> This might get interesting.
>
> Dirk Vdm
>
> Sergey:
>
> As I see, Dirk, you vaste time. I told you then, the problem with
> curl(grad) is, our theorem was confined by transverse waves.
Dirk Vdm wrote:
No, the problem was that you made a very simple mistake by
swapping the two angular coordinates after having applied
grad and before applying curl.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/72b73c5fd98f8a36
messages 6, 8, 10
The fact that you don't aknowledge that puts you right in
Androcles' camp. He has made fumbling and refusing to
aknowledge his mistakes into a way of life.
You will notice soon enough yourself.
Sergey:
Fly, fly, void beer barrel! Your snap crackle is larger than you are.
You are the same idle as your index page. ;-)
Sergey
- Next message: Sergey Karavashkin: "To Androcles about MMX"
- Previous message: John Sefton: "Re: neutrinos redshift?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
