Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity
From: Bernardz (Bernard_zzz_at_REMOVEhotmail.com)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: Jim Black: "Re: Is Faster-than-light Communication Possible?"
- Previous message: CWatters: "Re: Optics"
- In reply to: kenseto: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- Next in thread: kenseto: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- Reply: kenseto: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:51:48 +1100
In article <SL3Jd.20364$QC5.18924@fe2.columbus.rr.com>,
kenseto@erinet.com says...
>
> "Bernardz" <Bernard_zzz@REMOVEhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1c5ea60aad35ad3a989beb@news...
> > In article <_NOId.6675$VZ2.5986@fe1.columbus.rr.com>, kenseto@erinet.com
> > says...
> > > IRT (Improved Relativity Theory) is a New Theory of Motion.
> > > It includes SR as a subset. Its equations are valid in all
> > > environments....including gravity.
> > >
> > > The following is a description of IRT:
> > > The postulates:
> > > 1) The laws of physics based on a clock second and light path
> > > length of a measuring rod are the same for all observers in
> > > all inertial reference frames.
> > > 2) The speed of light in free space based on a clock second
> > > and the light path length of a measuring rod has the same
> > > mathematical ratio c in all directions and all inertial frames.
> > > 3) The laws of physics based on a defined absolute second
> > > and the physical length of a rod is different in different frames
> > > of reference.
> > > 4) The one-way speed of light in free space based on a defined absolute
> > > second and the physical length of a measuring rod has a different
> > > mathematical ratio for light speed in different inertial frames. The
> > > speed of light based on a defined absolute second and the physical
> > > length of a measuring rod is maximum in the rest frame of the aether.
> > >
> >
> > The concept of absolute time does not exist in SR
>
> You are wrong. SR implies that absolute time exists. The purpose of the SR
> math is to predict the clock time value in the observed frame for an
> interval of absolute time in the observer's frame. The GPS uses absolute
> time to synchronize the satellite clocks with the ground clocks. They
> redefined the satellite clock second to have 4.15 more ticks of the Cs atom.
> This redfined satellite second has the same absolute time content as the
> ground clock second which uses the standard definition and which has 4.15
> fewer ticks than the satellite clock second.
Well before you can talk of something you must know the language that
people use.
To me and many in this forum I am sure, *absolute* time does not mean
this!
>
> by adding it and
> > creating IRT. IST becomes either a different set to SR or a subset to
> > SR.
>
> ROTFLOL.....SR is an incomplete ether theory. It is a subset of IRT and IRT
> is a complete theory of motion. It equations are valid in all
> environments....including gravity.
By definition.
With a system, if you introduce something to it but otherwise leave it
the same what you have is a subset
While if in that system you replace something in it, what you have is a
new set.
While in that system, you take something out what it becomes is a super
set.
>
> Ken Seto
>
>
>
-- The world is not fair. Observations of Bernard - No 70
- Next message: Jim Black: "Re: Is Faster-than-light Communication Possible?"
- Previous message: CWatters: "Re: Optics"
- In reply to: kenseto: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- Next in thread: kenseto: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- Reply: kenseto: "Re: IRT: A New Theory of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|