Re: Guys, can you explain to Androcles that the Lorentz transform only applies to *inertial* frames?
From: Androcles (Androcles_at_)
Date: 02/02/05
- Next message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: John C. Polasek: "Re: Pioneer anomally"
- In reply to: John Schoenfeld: "Re: Guys, can you explain to Androcles that the Lorentz transform only applies to *inertial* frames?"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Guys, can you explain to Androcles that the Lorentz transform only applies to *inertial* frames?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 03:28:11 GMT
"John Schoenfeld" <j.schoenfeld@programmer.net> wrote in message
news:1107306393.600677.49800@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Androcles wrote:
> [snip]
>
> You and Heymann are birds of a feather.
The hell we are. Heymoron is a complete idiot, I'm only a half idiot.
Androcles
- Next message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: John C. Polasek: "Re: Pioneer anomally"
- In reply to: John Schoenfeld: "Re: Guys, can you explain to Androcles that the Lorentz transform only applies to *inertial* frames?"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Guys, can you explain to Androcles that the Lorentz transform only applies to *inertial* frames?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|