Re: Terraforming the Moon

From: The Ghost In The Machine (ewill_at_sirius.athghost7038suus.net)
Date: 02/21/05 

Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 23:00:06 GMT

In sci.physics, Androcles
<Androcles@MyPlace.org>
 wrote
on Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:00:01 GMT
<lZrSd.148532$B8.55876@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>:
>
> "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote in
> message news:qpgpe2-1nt.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net...
>> In sci.physics, habshi
>> <habshi@anony.net>
>> wrote
>> on Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:25:43 GMT
>> <4219d25e.5357268@news.clara.net>:
>>> What about putting a transmitter on the moon? It neednt
>>> even have any height as the moon can be seen from all over the earth.
>>
>> [rest crunch]
>>
>> Psst.
>>
>> In order to make this super obvious to everyone, assume
>> that there's an inveterate TV watcher -- we'll call him
>> Sleepless Jobless Joe Slob :-) -- and then ask the obvious
>> question as to whether he can watch Moon TV 24 hours a
>> day from a TV broadcasting antenna on the moon.
>>
>> In order to make it even more obvious assume that his
>> brother, Normalsleep Jobless Norman Slob, watches TV during
>> 12 hours a day during full moon (or 12 hours a night during
>> new moon).
>>
>> The hard worker of the family, Bill Slob, likes to watch
>> his favorite show on weeknights at 8 PM on Moon TV.
>>
>> See if you've figured out the rather obvious problem yet... :-)
>>
>> As a secondary problem, ask whether Joe can watch MoonTV
>> during new moon, and how he would do so. (Yes, he can
>> actually watch it during the day, as the moon is hanging
>> around somewhere near the Sun. The problem is at the
>> transmitter end -- where does the station get its power
>> from?)
>>
>> --
>> #191, ewill3@earthlink.net
>> It's still legal to go .sigless.
>
>
> The moon has no atmosphere and no surface water
> for the same reason the Earth has no helium or free hydrogen.
> The lighter elements float on top of the heavier elements, acheive
> escape velocity from collisions and solar energy and bugger off.
> Luna doesn't have sufficient mass to be terraformed.
>
> Androcles.
>

Wrong problem, though you're correct AFAICT, unless, of course,
one transports Joe Slob onto the moon in view of the transmission
tower.

(Not horribly likely unless Joe Slob is an unemployed astronaut.
Somehow I doubt there are many such.) 

-- 
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Thoughts on 1969
    ... I could replace the 2 bad tubes on our old B&W TV set so I could watch ... on the moon but I would be too old to do so. ... We went to Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. ... in IO, around Jupiter, we have now, as I tell you this, two machines ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Advertising in space !
    ... ....So what are people to watch? ... daytime programming is pretty much out of the question. ... The Moon is only full enough to use for this purpose for 3 nights ... The sheer number of channels we can choose from today - sadly, ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Omega Automatic Constellation Chronometer 561 - date adjust?
    ... Watch makers seem to take the same approach to dials that Microsoft ... Sun, moon and tide displays, date and date subdials with tiny pointers, ... One uses a 17 jewel xxx movement and the other a 24 jewel ...
    (alt.horology)
  • Re: first moon in space?
    ... First man on the moon was not wearing a watch when he walked on ... I find all the glory attached to "space" watches to be nothing but marketing ... It is well documented that Scott Carpenter wore a Breitling Navitimer ...
    (alt.horology)
  • Re: One for Kran!
    ... Vecht writes ... on account of the moon having moved further away. ... Best watch 'em now, then. ...
    (uk.rec.sheds)
Quantcast