Re: k-calculus
mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Previous message: Y.Porat: "Re: Packing of stones"
- In reply to: George Jones: "Re: k-calculus"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: k-calculus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 06:51:35 GMT
In article <Xns9604E6646DD71lkajehoriuasldfjknak@151.164.30.44>, John Schutkeker <jschutkeker@sbcglobal.net.nospam> writes:
>George Jones <george_llew_jones@yahoo.com> wrote in
>news:sNednTuJmorldYrfRVn-rg@look.ca:
>
>>> It was E^2 = m_0^2*c^4 - c^2*p^2 ...
>
>> Did you use the notation m_0 for historical accuracy?
>
>I took 8.04 in '81. What are they calling m_0 these days?
m
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
- Next message: Morituri-|-Max: "Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon"
- Previous message: Y.Porat: "Re: Packing of stones"
- In reply to: George Jones: "Re: k-calculus"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: k-calculus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]