Re: Quantum Mechanics according to Mark Mccutcheon

From: Q-on (physicsofchi_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/22/05 

Date: 22 Feb 2005 02:41:47 -0800

Morituri-|-Max wrote:
> bryant_j_j@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> We are looking for
> >> old videos of any possible Randi based tests to look
> >> for how the psi disabling may occur (via out of time
> >> scanning remembering psi is outside spacetime and plan
> >> setups to counter that. I was discussing all this with
> >> a couple of clairvoyants that other day talking about
> >> etheric shielding and amplifying. Veteran seers they
> >> know can disable their abilities temporarily.
> >
> > many people claim things which they make up. well if they can
> > temporarily "disable" their psi, then i am a member of the White
> > Adept.
> >
> > you are pathetic Q-on. you waste everybody's time on nothing. you
did
> > not deliver anything. moron.
>
> Yep, classic fallback.. he is setting it up in advance so if these
"qi
> powers" don't appear, "somebody" must be disabling them with negative
karmic
> energy dude...

I hope goggle won't erase any of the database so that in year 2020
or 2015 or even 2012 when qi physics hit mainstream. You guys can
look back and read what you wrote. My worries now is china
physicists may produce qi physics soon and Randi may cancel the
million prize due to its becoming part of science.

About disabling of abilities. This is why we want to use shield
that would enclose the testing area to present thoughtforms from
getting through. This may be the reason some genuine psychics
failed in the presence of heavy skeptics. It's like this. It seems
more and more likely we are dealing with some kind of Aether
phenomena whether Lorentz Aether or others we are not sure.
Consciousness is an intrinsic property of the Aether meaning
our thought waves can interact with the Aether... this is the
reason qi being ethereal particles can be influenced by
thoughts. Therefore concentrated skeptics can send etheric
particles to disturb the experiment setup and subject enough to
defocus his psi etheric wave. So the only thing to prevent
that from happening is creating some kind of shield (perhaps
magnetic shield) in between the test subjects, targets and
the skeptical crews of say James Randi.

You won't believe any of it. It's ok. We were dong preliminary
test simulation and this is what we found out how thoughtforms
can so disturb the etheric atmosphere that the psi wave is
spread or distorted. It appears it has to do with numbers.
In a room with 6 skeptics and 1 psychic. The psychic can get
overwhelmed by all the thoughtforms. To make it successful.
We need at least 3 psychic with the 2 projecting protective
etheric field around the main subject or we need very powerful
psychic that can resist the 6 skeptics thoughtforms. It appears
very powerful psychic hasn't actually tried Randi. All Randi
has are average psychics where 6 skeptics can easily overwhelm.
I'm still thinking of the possible variations of all.

Darn. I shouldn't have written all this but kept it to myself.
The more I write. The less chance I have on Randi's millions
because an adventurous new ager who may be reading this in
the future (via goggle search of "qi") would realize what I'm
talking about and make proper setups, etc.

At this point. I won't speak more. I'd just tolerate all the
negative feedback. I won't make you skeptics stand in my way
of the millions. Just hope this thread won't be erased because
in 2020 or less I want you to look back and read the stupid
things you wrote.

While waiting for my visa and arriving at some rough
understanding of the physics of qi. I'm looking into telekinesis
and hunting for those with the abilities. I want to know if
telekinesis is real or just a figment of the imagination. The
physics of qi depends on the extent of the paranormal powers.
My experience is only with qi manipulating it in my body and
others. I haven't seen a pencil floating in air. And I'm
beginning to get interest in this. See the post "China
Military PK, Teleportation, etc. Experiments & Physics" that
I'd post in a while.

Q-on

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Precautionary Principle , warming and models
    ... talking about "most of us AGW skeptics", ... chemistry and math up to and including tensor calculus and physics statistics. ... Now, you make it sound like listening to the consensus of scientists in the field is an astonishing choice, but hey, you're in good company - a lot of other people mistrust what they cannot understand as well. ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: Precautionary Principle , warming and models
    ... talking about "most of us AGW skeptics", ... I don't hide my amateur qualifications - BSc in physics and some ... on everything from gas well reservoirs to infra-red measurements of ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Next word guessing contest !
    ... It's time for another word guessing contest, where skeptics think of a word, ... encrypt it with MD5 password encryption algorithm, ... Psychics take as many guesses as they like. ... The target should be to sustain a hit rate double the expected average. ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • Re: The greatest debunking treatise of Paranormal Skeptics!
    ... Skeptics want to see the demo, but instead we get excuses and this nonsense. ... O.K., on rare rare occasions, psychics have had the courage to try a real test; under the simple and direct controls that knowledgeable skeptics apply, the psychics have demonstrated a 100% failure rate. ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • Re: (OT) What Global Warming has in common with Marxism
    ... are particularly prone to skepticism and, conversely, the uneducated ... Global Warming whose Fat Boy is Al Gore. ... I've only said I want you to focus on physics, ... why is it that skeptics would rather insult Al Gore than discuss ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)