Re: 4 prohumanist continued

From: Didymus (kellytom_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 02/02/05 

Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:13:07 GMT

"Bob" <wf3h@ptd.net> wrote in message
news:41f168a1.47318081@usenet.ptd.net...
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:35:31 -0900, david <dgordon@ak.net> wrote:

> >Science claims that God did not create anything because God does not
> >exist,

Science makes no such claim. You don't even know THAT about science, yet
you're telling us all about how the universe came into existence? Amazing
what you see on the Internet.

> and that the universe created itself naturalistic'ly and that
> >life just 'happened' by random chance...

Are you saying that God created himself ? How did that happen? And why?

Or did he just "happen" by random chance?

Didymus

Relevant Pages

  • Re: funny creationsist
    ... this group when s/he wrote: ... On the contrary, it has opened my mind to the reality of this universe, ... I'll match science against your bible any day - and win. ... existence and by faith attribute the singularity to this same unknown ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: More on the addled brain of Francis Collins...
    ... the inexplicable fact that Mother Theresa existed at all. ... trying to say that morality cannot be justified by science, ... existence of moral behavior in the first place. ... There is no one "uniquely human moral law." ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Pope - the end of the church as we know it ...?
    ... I am merely having a pop at how the ignorant blind masses follow whatever science has to say, ... explain how and why the image of a crucified man was impressed on this linen burial cloth. ... existence of God and his power to intervene in the world - the Shroud merits more serious consideration from you than you have hitherto given, judging by the flippant attitude you invariably take when asked quite simple questions about it. ...
    (uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool)
  • Re: Hammond correct?
    ... > existence. ... You show me one reference which makes that distinction ... from the philosophy of science references that I have found. ... says the universe is between 11.2 billion and 20 billion years old. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Hammond correct?
    ... > existence. ... You show me one reference which makes that distinction ... from the philosophy of science references that I have found. ... says the universe is between 11.2 billion and 20 billion years old. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)