Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/24/05
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Expanding Space"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:55:29 -0600
robert j. kolker wrote:
>
>
> Albert wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Oh, yes. 'Good approximations' have given us 3.57 uncracked eggs,
>> partial pregnancies, 2.5 children, and modern economics.
>
>
> Those are -averages-, not approximations.
I fail to see the difference.
-- "Mercifully free of the ravages of intelligence" -- Time Bandits
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Expanding Space"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
