Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 02/24/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Jim Hutton: ".Minkowski Spacetime diagram."
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:26:08 -0500
Albert wrote:
>
> I fail to see the difference.
Aproximation is convergence to a definite value by means of a repetative
algorithm. Averaging over a set of numbers consists of adding them up
and diving by the number of addends. Contrast finding the square root of
two by the Newton-Rapheson approximation to finding the average age of
persons living in Philadelphia on a given day. Different processes
entirely. One knows ab initio that the averge of a set of numbers is not
likely to be a number in that set.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Jim Hutton: ".Minkowski Spacetime diagram."
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|