Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?

From: Jeany (ctiei_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/25/05 

Date: 24 Feb 2005 17:05:41 -0800

Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> "Jeany" <ctiei@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109249867.670301.31070@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > You are right in SR.
> >
> > u and u' are the same in SR and Lorentz transformation, so we don't
use
> > the symbol u' in derivations and we always use u whichever it is u
or
> > u'.
>
> So your remark was unrelated to what I was telling you,
> and there was no reason for you to make the remark.
> Do you understand that the text is wrong and that every
> reference to SR should be removed?
> If not, can you *exactly* tell me which line you don't
> accept or understand in everything I have been telling
> you?
>
> Dirk Vdm

I would think that a new theory or a unified theory must include SR &
GR and QM, which doesn't mean its foundation is fully compatible with
SR. The only difference between SR and TAST is | u |=| u'| in SR and |
u |<=| u'| in TAST.

Please refer to 1.2 Coordinates transformation at the website of TAST
at http://tastphysics.com .

Jeany

Relevant Pages