Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?
From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Previous message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- In reply to: JM Albuquerque: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:31:51 +0100
JM Albuquerque wrote:
> "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> escreveu na mensagem
> news:cvl2rs$594$2@titan.btinternet.com...
>
>>"JM Albuquerque" <jm.aREM.OVE@sapo.pt> wrote in message
>>news:384n9rF5jituoU1@individual.net...
>
>
>
> (snip)
>
>
>
>>>On the contrary, a static E field creates a magnetic field.
>>
>>False
>
>
> Pick a coil and a battery.
> Feed the coil with DC from the battery.
> Observe the magnetic field placing any iron piece nearby.
> (Any kid from school knows that).
Notice that the static E-field *alone* did not produce the
magnetic field here. You needed the current running in the coil
in order to produce the B-field. So your original assertion
was at best incomplete, and Franz' reply "false" was right on the
mark.
Bye,
Bjoern
- Next message: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQ's OVER 150"
- Previous message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
- In reply to: JM Albuquerque: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Is electromagnetic field theory unified?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|