Re: 2nd Chez Watt - Astronomers: 'Dark' galaxy discovered

From: Axel Harvey (axe_at_cam.org)
Date: 02/25/05

Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
Previous message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
In reply to: shane: "Re: 2nd Chez Watt - Astronomers: 'Dark' galaxy discovered"
Next in thread: Harvest Dancer: "Re: 2nd Chez Watt - Astronomers: 'Dark' galaxy discovered"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]

Date: 25 Feb 2005 13:48:21 -0800

shane wrote:

> I agree, my point was that we usually use the word appear with things

> that are visible.
> --
> shane
> And the truth shall set you free.

Hmmm... It appears that I have missed lunch because of reading silly
Usenet again.

Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?"
Previous message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
In reply to: shane: "Re: 2nd Chez Watt - Astronomers: 'Dark' galaxy discovered"
Next in thread: Harvest Dancer: "Re: 2nd Chez Watt - Astronomers: 'Dark' galaxy discovered"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]

Relevant Pages

Re: 2nd Chez Watt - Astronomers: Dark galaxy discovered
... shane wrote: ... Hmmm... ... It appears that I have missed lunch because of reading silly ... Usenet again. ...
(sci.astro)
Re: Social Darwinism
... Shane wrote:> ... > Possibly, but it is impossible to tell over Usenet; ... > share a number of characterisitcs with with a famous one that has an ... Prev by Date: ...
(talk.origins)
Re: Test
... Shane wrote: ... >> Never post an unmunged email address on Usenet or messageboards. ...
(microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
Re: Social Darwinism
... > Shane wrote:> ... >> Possibly, but it is impossible to tell over Usenet; ... >> share a number of characterisitcs with with a famous one that has an ... evolution in it. ...
(talk.origins)